Symmetric and asymmetric rounding: A review and some new results

作者: H. Schneeweiss , J. Komlos , A. S. Ahmad

DOI: 10.1007/S10182-010-0125-2

关键词:

摘要: Using rounded data to estimate moments and regression coefficients typically biases the estimates. We explore bias-inducing effects of rounding, thereby reviewing widely dispersed often half forgotten results in literature. Under appropriate conditions, these can be approximately rectified by versions Sheppard’s correction formula. discuss conditions under which approximations are valid also investigate efficiency loss caused rounding. The rounding error, corresponds measurement error a model, has marginal distribution, approximated uniform but is not independent true value. In order take account preferences (heaping), we generalize concept simple that asymmetric consider its effect on mean variance distribution.

参考文章(56)
Chiang-Sheng Lee, Stephen B. Vardeman, Interval Estimation of a Normal Process Mean from Rounded Data Journal of Quality Technology. ,vol. 33, pp. 335- 348 ,(2001) , 10.1080/00224065.2001.11980083
Piet Rietveld, Rounding of Arrival and Departure Times in Travel Surveys: An Interpretation in Terms of Scheduled Activities Journal of transportation and statistics. ,vol. 5, pp. 71- 81 ,(2001)
Arthur P. Dempster, Donald B. Rubin, Rounding Error in Regression: The Appropriateness of Sheppard's Corrections, Journal of the royal statistical society series b-methodological. ,vol. 45, pp. 51- 59 ,(1983) , 10.1111/J.2517-6161.1983.TB01230.X
John Komlos, A. Ahmad, Hans Schneeweiß, Symmetric and Asymmetric Rounding ,(2006) , 10.5282/UBM/EPUB.1847
N. F. Gjeddebæk, Contribution to the Study of Grouped Observations Scandinavian Actuarial Journal. ,vol. 1949, pp. 135- 159 ,(1949) , 10.1080/03461238.1949.10419768
Tony Tricker, Effects of Rounding Data Sampled from the Exponential Distribution Journal of Applied Statistics. ,vol. 11, pp. 54- 87 ,(1984) , 10.1080/02664768400000007
Herman Wold, Sheppard's correction formulae in several variables Scandinavian Actuarial Journal. ,vol. 1934, pp. 248- 255 ,(1934) , 10.1080/03461238.1934.10419243
I. D. Hill, Interpreting ‘Crazy’ Estimates Journal of Applied Statistics. ,vol. 11, pp. 51- 53 ,(1984) , 10.1080/02664768400000006