Qualitative research methods: key features and insights gained from use in infection prevention research

作者: Jane Forman , John W. Creswell , Laura Damschroder , Christine P. Kowalski , Sarah L. Krein

DOI: 10.1016/J.AJIC.2008.03.010

关键词:

摘要: Infection control professionals and hospital epidemiologists are accustomed to using quantitative research. Although studies extremely important in the field of infection prevention, often they cannot help us explain why certain factors affect use practices identify underlying mechanisms through which do so. Qualitative research methods, open-ended techniques, such as interviews, collect data nonstatistical techniques analyze it, provide detailed, diverse insights individuals, useful quotes that bring a realism applied research, information about how different health care settings operate. can illuminate processes statistical correlations, inform development interventions, show interventions work produce observed outcomes. This article describes key features qualitative advantages add existing approaches study control. We address goal nature process, sampling, collection analysis, validity, generalizability findings, presentation findings. Health services researchers increasingly methods practical problems by uncovering interacting influences complex environments. with expertise rigor, contribute prevention efforts.

参考文章(24)
Shortell Sm, The emergence of qualitative methods in health services research. Health Services Research. ,vol. 34, pp. 1083- 1090 ,(1999)
Michael Quinn Patton, Qualitative research and evaluation methods ,(1980)
John W. Creswell, Vicki L. Plano Clark, Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research ,(2006)
M Q Patton, Enhancing the quality and credibility of qualitative analysis. Health Services Research. ,vol. 34, pp. 1189- 1208 ,(1999)
E. Yoko Furuya, Heather A. Cook, Mei-Ho Lee, Maureen Miller, Elaine Larson, Sandra Hyman, Phyllis Della-Latta, Eneida A. Mendonca, Franklin D. Lowy, Community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus prevalence: how common is it? A methodological comparison of prevalence ascertainment. American Journal of Infection Control. ,vol. 35, pp. 359- 366 ,(2007) , 10.1016/J.AJIC.2006.12.009
Margarete Sandelowski, Sample size in qualitative research Research in Nursing & Health. ,vol. 18, pp. 179- 183 ,(1995) , 10.1002/NUR.4770180211
Sanjay Saint, Christine P. Kowalski, Jane Forman, Laura Damschroder, Timothy P. Hofer, Samuel R. Kaufman, John W. Creswell, Sarah L. Krein, A multicenter qualitative study on preventing hospital-acquired urinary tract infection in US hospitals Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology. ,vol. 29, pp. 333- 341 ,(2008) , 10.1086/529589
Rabih O. Darouiche, Lance Goetz, Teresa Kaldis, Colleen Cerra-Stewart, Atef AlSharif, Michael Priebe, Impact of StatLock securing device on symptomatic catheter-related urinary tract infection: A prospective, randomized, multicenter clinical trial American Journal of Infection Control. ,vol. 34, pp. 555- 560 ,(2006) , 10.1016/J.AJIC.2006.03.010
Nicholas Graves, Edward Tong, Anthony P. Morton, Kate Halton, Merrilyn Curtis, David Lairson, Michael Whitby, Factors associated with health care-acquired urinary tract infection. American Journal of Infection Control. ,vol. 35, pp. 387- 392 ,(2007) , 10.1016/J.AJIC.2006.09.006
Lee J. Cronbach, Beyond the Two Disciplines of Scientific Psychology. American Psychologist. ,vol. 30, pp. 116- 127 ,(1975) , 10.1037/H0076829