The Model of Strategic e-Learning: Understanding and Evaluating Student e-Learning from Metacognitive Perspectives

作者: Meng-Jung Tsai

DOI:

关键词:

摘要: This paper presents the Model of Strategic e-Learning to explain and evaluate student e-learning from metacognitive perspectives. An in-depth interview, pilot study main are employed construct model develop an instrument—the Online Learning Strategies Scale (OLSS). The framework is constructed illustrated by four dimensions characteristics environments three core domains (perceived-skill, affection self-regulation) strategies. also tries identify analyze elements corresponding each domain strategy. Based on this model, OLSS finally contains 20 items with good validity reliability. instrument provides a diagnostic for researchers, system designers, curriculum developers instructors students’ elearning strategies in their experiment, design development. concludes presenting several future research directions.

参考文章(36)
Barry J. Zimmerman, Models of Self-Regulated Learning and Academic Achievement Springer, New York, NY. pp. 1- 25 ,(1989) , 10.1007/978-1-4612-3618-4_1
W.J. McKeachie, THE NEED FOR STUDY STRATEGY TRAINING Learning and Study Strategies#R##N#Issues in Assessment, Instruction, and Evaluation. pp. 3- 9 ,(1988) , 10.1016/B978-0-12-742460-6.50007-4
Charles Johnson, Gerald Farr, Charles Hale, Deanie French, Internet Based Learning: A Framework for Higher Education and Business Stylus Publishing, LLC. ,(1999)
Marcia C. Linn, Philip Bell, Elizabeth A. Davis, Internet Environments for Science Education Routledge. ,(2004) , 10.4324/9781410610393
Vera Woloshyn, Michael Pressley, Cognitive Strategy Instruction that Really Improves Children's Academic Performance. Cognitive Strategy Training Series. Second Edition. Brookline Books, P.O. Box 1047, Cambridge, MA 02238-1047; phone: 800-666-BOOK ($27.95).. ,(1995)
Thomas Fox McManus, Individualizing instruction in a web-based hypermedia learning environment: nonlinearity, advance organizers, and self-regulated learners The Journal of Interactive Learning Research. ,vol. 11, pp. 219- 251 ,(2000)