Local versus regime convergence regression models: a comparison of two approaches

作者: Panagiotis Artelaris

DOI: 10.1007/S10708-014-9551-0

关键词:

摘要: Two types of econometric models have typically been used in geographical research: global and local. The former produces parameter estimates that represent an average type economic behavior; is, for each variable there is one regression coefficient the entire sample. latter suggests relationship interest can vary widely over space allowing parameters to change across spatial entities. Commonly, results obtained from these two different approaches are compared other determine which model performed better. aim this paper twofold. First foremost, it show a comparison between local problematic misleading since overlooks critical group known as regime models. This means should be extended by including all (i.e. global, regime). Sometimes, perform well as, or even better, than (more complex) something taken into account empirical studies. Secondly, investigates convergence process regions (enlarged) European Union (EU) period 1995–2005. (convergence) seems better any employed, implying very low rate among highlighting heterogeneous impact EU integration process.

参考文章(115)
Roberta Capello, Peter Nijkamp, Handbook of regional growth and development theories Research Papers in Economics. ,(2009) , 10.4337/9781848445987
Manolis Christofakis, Athanasios Papadaskalopoulos, The Growth Poles Strategy in Regional Planning: The Recent Experience of Greece Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management. ,vol. 6, pp. 5- 20 ,(2011)
Alain Desdoigts, Patterns of Economic Development and the Formation of Clubs Journal of Economic Growth. ,vol. 4, pp. 305- 330 ,(1999) , 10.1023/A:1009858603947
Manfred M. Fischer, Claudia Stirböck, Pan-European regional income growth and club-convergence. Insights from a spatial econometric perspective Annals of Regional Science. ,vol. 40, pp. 693- 721 ,(2006) , 10.1007/S00168-005-0042-6
Masahisa Fujita, Paul Krugman, Anthony J. Venables, The Spatial Economy Southern Economic Journal. ,vol. 67, pp. 491- ,(1999) , 10.7551/MITPRESS/6389.001.0001
William Baumol, Edward Wolff, Productivity growth, convergence, and welfare: Reply The American Economic Review. ,vol. 78, pp. 1155- 1159 ,(1988)
Luc Anselin, Raymond J. G. M. Florax, Small Sample Properties of Tests for Spatial Dependence in Regression Models: Some Further Results New Directions in Spatial Econometrics. pp. 21- 74 ,(1995) , 10.1007/978-3-642-79877-1_2
Chris Brunsdon, Martin Charlton, A S Fotheringham, Geographically Weighted Regression: The Analysis of Spatially Varying Relationships ,(2002)
Luc Anselin, Sergio J. Florax, Raymond, Rey, Advances in Spatial Econometrics: Methodology, Tools and Applications Springer-Verlag. ,(2004)