Survey on small animal anaesthesia

作者: A NICHOLSON , ADJ WATSON

DOI: 10.1111/J.1751-0813.2001.TB10780.X

关键词:

摘要: Objective To ascertain anaesthetic practices used currently for dogs and cats in Australia. Methods A questionnaire was distributed to 4800 veterinarians throughout Australia, seeking data on numbers of anaesthetised per week; drug preferences premedication, induction maintenance; use tracheal intubation, supplemental O2, nitrous oxide antagonists; types vaporisers, breathing systems monitoring devices or available. Additional questions concerned proportions different animal seen the practice, respondent's university year graduation. Results The response rate 19%; 95% respondents graduated from Australian universities, about half since 1985. Most responses (79%) came mainly small practices. On average 16 12 were each week. Premedication more often than cats, with acepromazine atropine most favoured both species. For induction, thiopentone preferred alphaxalone/alphadolone cats. Inhaled agents, especially halothane, maintenance usually employed intubation when using inhalational maintenance, but rates lower during injectable a minority provided O2. Nitrous administered regularly by 13% respondents. agents frequently speed recovery anaesthesia doxapram yohimbine. widely vaporisers Fluotec Mark III Stephens machine. (95%) rebreathing circuit large non-rebreathing system 68% (93%) indicated some form aid available monitor general anaesthesia: three mentioned an apnoea alarm, oesophageal stethoscope electrocardiogram. Conclusion Diverse approaches evident, there appeared be less variation anaesthetising dogs: premedication frequent varied type, while thiobarbituates dominated inhalants maintenance. Injectable techniques had substantial little dogs. Evident disparity between circuits suggested either confusion terminology incorrect in-circuit. While equipment dedicated observer invigilate anaesthesia, common reliance alarms is concern, because unproven reliability accuracy.

参考文章(19)
Peter J Pascoe, D. H. Dyson, M. O'Grady, D. G. Allen, W. Ingwersen, Effects of saffan on cardiopulmonary function in healthy cats. Canadian Journal of Veterinary Research-revue Canadienne De Recherche Veterinaire. ,vol. 51, pp. 236- 239 ,(1987)
Hamlin Rl, Werner Ll, Muir Ww, Effects of xylazine and acetylpromazine upon induced ventricular fibrillation in dogs anesthetized with thiamylal and halothane. American Journal of Veterinary Research. ,vol. 36, pp. 1299- 1303 ,(1975)
L. Stogdale, Laryngeal oedema due to Saffan in a cat Veterinary Record. ,vol. 102, pp. 283- 284 ,(1978) , 10.1136/VR.102.13.283
A.M. Scuffham, S.F. Forsyth, B.R. Jones, A survey of anaesthetic equipment in veterinary practices in New Zealand. New Zealand Veterinary Journal. ,vol. 43, pp. 16- 20 ,(1995) , 10.1080/00480169.1995.35834
Colin I. Dunlop, The Case for Rebreathing Circuits for Very Small Animals Veterinary Clinics of North America: Small Animal Practice. ,vol. 22, pp. 400- 403 ,(1992) , 10.1016/S0195-5616(92)50650-7
DH Dyson, MG Maxie, D Schnurr, Morbidity and Mortality Associated with Anesthetic Management in Small Animal Veterinary Practice in Ontario Journal of The American Animal Hospital Association. ,vol. 34, pp. 325- 335 ,(1998) , 10.5326/15473317-34-4-325
P. Taylor, Respiratory obstruction after anaesthesia. Veterinary Record. ,vol. 125, pp. 308- 309 ,(1989) , 10.1136/VR.125.11.308