Clinical Evaluation Methods for Posterior Composite Restorations

摘要: Two methods of evaluating the in vivo wear posterior composite restorations are described and compared with USPHS direct clinical evaluation system. The three were consistent among themselves over two years study. In order increasing sensitivity, were: USPHS, total ranking models, categorizing models according to a set standards. last procedure identified statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) between formulations as early nine-month recall. All experienced time, but at decreasing rate.