Some Animals Are More Equal Than Others

作者: Leslie Pickering Francis , Richard Norman

DOI: 10.1017/S0031819100026358

关键词:

摘要: It is a welcome development when academic philosophy starts to concern itself with practical issues, in such way as influence people's lives. Recently this has happened one moral issue particular—but infortunately it the wrong issue, and actions have been influenced way. The that of status treatment animals. A number philosophers argued for what they call ‘animal liberation’, comparing directly egalitarian causes women's liberation racial equality suggesting that, if racism sexism are rationally indefensible, so ‘speciesism’. If ought give equal consideration interests all human beings, then, daim, must on same grounds recognize ‘all animals equal’, be or non-human. We believe assimilation liberation’ movements mistaken.

参考文章(21)
John A. Robertson, Involuntary Euthanasia of Defective Newborns: A Legal Analysis Stanford Law Review. ,vol. 27, pp. 213- 269 ,(1975) , 10.2307/1228265
Robert M. Veatch, Choosing Not to Prolong Dying Biomedical Ethics and the Law. pp. 517- 524 ,(1972) , 10.1007/978-1-4615-6561-1_34
Theodore D. Tjossem, Intervention strategies for high risk infants and young children University Park Press. ,(1976)
Patrick F. Bray, Neurology in Pediatrics ,(1969)
Tom Regan, Peter Singer, Animal rights and human obligations Philosophy. ,vol. 53, ,(1989)
Basil B. Bernstein, Class, codes and control ,(1971)
Jonathan Glover, Causing Death and Saving Lives ,(1977)
John O. Forfar, Gavin C. Arneil, Textbook of paediatrics ,(1986)