Historical Sociology and the Arab Uprising
作者： Raymond Hinnebusch
DOI: 10.1080/13629395.2013.856180
关键词:
摘要: Historical sociology's perspectives—co-constitution of the international and domestic, path-dependency, variegated regime types—help illuminate state formation paths leading to Arab Uprising. It also points how contention between mass mobilization unleashed by Uprising oligarchic inheritances is issuing in hybrid outcomes.
st-andrews.ac.uk
sci-hub.se 参考文章(7)
Peter Jones, The Arab Spring International Journal: Canada's Journal of Global Policy Analysis. ,vol. 67, pp. 447- 463 ,(2012) , 10.1177/002070201206700214
Michael Mann, The autonomous power of the state: its origins, mechanisms and results Archives Europeennes De Sociologie. ,vol. 25, pp. 185- 213 ,(1984) , 10.1017/S0003975600004239
Robert Michels, Political Parties: A Sociological Study of the Oligarchical Tendencies of Modern Democracy ,(1911)
Samuel P. Huntington, Political Order in Changing Societies ,(1968)
James Mahoney, Path dependence in historical sociology Theory and Society. ,vol. 29, pp. 507- 548 ,(2000) , 10.1023/A:1007113830879
Raymond Hinnebusch, Toward a Historical Sociology of State Formation in the Middle East Middle East Critique. ,vol. 19, pp. 201- 216 ,(2010) , 10.1080/19436149.2010.514470
Yaniv Voller, Ewan Stein, George Lawson, Nicholas Kitchen, Tobias Thiel, Ranj Alaaldin, Kristian Coates Ulrichsen, Naysan Rafati, Christopher Phillips, Toby Dodge, Fatima El Issawi, After the Arab Spring: Power Shift in the Middle East? ,(2012)