Teaching the Normative Theory of Causal Reasoning

作者: Richard Seheines , Matt Easterday , David Danks

DOI: 10.1093/ACPROF:OSO/9780195176803.003.0009

关键词:

摘要: There is now substantial agreement about the representational component of a normative theory causal reasoning: Causal Bayes Nets. less discovery from data, either computationally or cognitively, and almost no work investigating how teaching Nets apparatus might help individuals faced with learning task. Psychologists working to describe naive participants represent learn structure data have focused primarily on single trials under variety conditions. In contrast, one focuses sample drawn population some experimental observational study regime. Through virtual Causality Lab that embodies reasoning which allows us record student behavior, we begun systematically explore best teach theory. this paper explain overall project report pilot studies suggest students can quickly be taught (appear to) quite rational. Acknowledgements We thank Adrian Tang Greg Price for invaluable programming Lab, Clark Glymour forcing get point, Dave Sobel Steve Sloman several helpful discussions. * This research was supported by James S. McDonnell Foundation, Institute Education Science, William Flora Hewlett National Aeronautics Space Administration, Office Naval Research (grant Human Machine Cognition: Systems Technology Address Critical Navy Need Present Future 2004). 1 Dept. Philosophy Human-Computer Interaction at Carnegie Mellon University. 2 Mellon. 3 Department Philosophy, Mellon, Cognition, University West Florida.

参考文章(39)
Clark Glymour, Learning Causes: Psychological Explanations of Causal Explanation ^1 Minds and Machines. ,vol. 8, pp. 39- 60 ,(1998) , 10.1023/A:1008234330618
Thomas L. Griffiths, Joshua B. Tenenbaum, Theory-Based Causal Inference neural information processing systems. ,vol. 15, pp. 43- 50 ,(2002)
Alison Gopnik, Clark Glymour, David M. Sobel, Laura E. Schulz, Tamar Kushnir, David Danks, A Theory of Causal Learning in Children: Causal Maps and Bayes Nets. Psychological Review. ,vol. 111, pp. 3- 32 ,(2004) , 10.1037/0033-295X.111.1.3
Judea Pearl, Causality Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie. ,vol. 64, ,(2009) , 10.1017/CBO9780511803161
Alison Gopnik, Clark Glymour, David M. Sobel, Laura E. Schulz, Causal learning mechanisms in very young children: two-, three-, and four-year-olds infer causal relations from patterns of variation and covariation. Developmental Psychology. ,vol. 37, pp. 620- 629 ,(2001) , 10.1037//0012-1649.37.5.620
Thomas L. Griffiths, Joshua B. Tenenbaum, Structure Learning in Human Causal Induction neural information processing systems. pp. 59- 65 ,(2000)
José C. Perales, David R. Shanks, Normative and descriptive accounts of the influence of power and contingency on causal judgement. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. ,vol. 56, pp. 977- 1007 ,(2003) , 10.1080/02724980244000738
Clark Glymour, Peter Spirtes, Richard Scheines, Causation, Prediction, and Search, 2nd Edition MIT Press Books. ,vol. 1, ,(2001)
Thomas L. Griffiths, Joshua B. Tenenbaum, Elizabeth R. Baraff, Using Physical Theories to Infer Hidden Causal Structure Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. ,vol. 26, ,(2004)