摘要: When pragmatics was established as a new subdiscipline in linguistics the 1960s and 1970s, pragmaticists referred to Peirce one of their ancestors. Since then, has remained collective memory pragmatics, is cited now then—but not more. As matter fact, his ideas on natural language communication have hardly been scrutinized, let alone applied, wrongly so. This paper shows that later sketched theory communication, which offers perspective heavily debated Semantics-Pragmatics-Interface. contextualist. But he did refrain from developing formal method analyze meaning sentences uttered. Standing between radical side formalists other, furnishes us with nothing less than an architect’s plan bridge two approaches, look for ways phenomenon language.
jhu.edu 参考文章(66)
Georg Peter, Gerhard Preyer, Contextualism in Philosophy: Knowledge, Meaning and Truth Clarendon Press , Oxford University Press. ,(2005)
Jaakko Hintikka, The Place of C.S. Peirce in the History of Logical Theory Lingua Universalis vs. Calculus Ratiocinator. pp. 140- 161 ,(1997) , 10.1007/978-94-015-8601-6_5
François Recanati, Literalism and Contextualism: Some Varieties Oxford University Press. ,(2003)
Wolfgang U. Dressler, Interactions between Iconicity and Other Semiotic Parameters in Language John Benjamins Publishing Company. pp. 21- ,(1995)
Georg Peter, Gerhard Preyer, Context-Sensitivity and Semantic Minimalism : New Essays on Semantics and Pragmatics ,(2007)
Brigitte Nerlich, David D. Clarke, Language, Action and Context: The Early History of Pragmatics in Europe and America 1780-1930 ,(1996)
John Preston, Thought and Language Cambridge University Press. ,(1998) , 10.1017/CBO9780511563782
Ken Turner, The semantics/pragmatics interface from different points of view Elsevier. ,(1999)
Nirit Kadmon, Formal Pragmatics: Semantics, Pragmatics, Presupposition, and Focus ,(2001)
Gerhard Vigener, Die zeichentheoretischen Entwürfe von F. de Saussure und Ch. S. Peirce als Grundlagen einer linguistischen Pragmatik Narr. ,(1979)