Pragmatic assessment in adult aphasia: A clinical review
作者： Sriwimon Manochiopinig , Christine Sheard , Vicki A. Reed
DOI: 10.1080/02687039208249489
关键词:
摘要: Abstract A range of pragmatic assessment instruments available for use with adults aphasia is reviewed in relation to a specified perspective meanings (Bates 1976). The are divided into five hroad categories. These categories are: (1) observational profiles, (2) communicative efficiency measures, (3) standardized testing real and/or simulated life situations, (4) family/significant others questionnaires/analyses, and (5) composite assessments. This provides basis comparing the instruments' features can assist clinicians selecting appropriate approaches.
sci-hub.se 参考文章(33)
Audrey L. Holland, When is Aphasia Aphasia? The Problem of Closed Head Injury. BRK Publishers. ,(1982)
Cheri L. Florance, Methods of Communication Analysis used in Family Interaction Therapy BRK Publishers. ,(1981)
John M. Pettit, Patricia M. Houghton, Michael P. Towey, Measuring Communication Competence in Global Aphasia BRK Publishers. ,(1982)
Sam Chwat, Gail B. Gurland, Comparative Family Perspectives on Aphasia: Diagnostic, Treatment, and Counseling Implications BRK Publishers. ,(1981)
Gail V. Pashek, Carol S. Swindell, Audrey L. Holland, A Questionnaire for Surveying Personal and Communicative Style BRK Publishers. ,(1982)
Michael Collins, Diagnosis and Treatment of Global Aphasia ,(1991)
Elizabeth Bates, Language and context: The acquisition of pragmatics ,(1976)
John Langshaw Austin, How to do things with words ,(1962)
Ruth Lesser, Linguistic investigations of aphasia ,(1978)
Audrey L. Holland, Observing Functional Communication of Aphasic Adults Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders. ,vol. 47, pp. 50- 56 ,(1982) , 10.1044/JSHD.4701.50