Mass-culling of a threatened island flying fox species failed to increase fruit growers’ profits and revealed gaps to be addressed for effective conservation

摘要: Abstract Human-wildlife conflicts (HWC) pose a growing threat to biodiversity worldwide and solutions can be as sound the understanding of HWC itself. Conservation biologists therefore must carefully examine their local situations inform on which approach strategies may best. In this context, Mauritius implemented what first mass-culls an already threatened native species when it culled flying fox (Pteropus niger) in 2015 2016 try increase fruit producers’ profits. Although Red List category consequently worsened ‘Endangered’ production dropped substantially, third mass-cull was decided 2018. A critical analysis is important draw lessons that help prevent recurrences particularly involving Pteropus spp. are common set worsen. We synthesized best literature available locally also elsewhere relevant situations, critically appraise setting, nature, timeline events outcome both completed mass-culling campaigns explore why how they happened so towards devising better approaches such conflicts. The idea cull P. niger originated around 2002 small done 2006. started immediately after Mauritius’ protection law weakened primarily legalize culls species, but still breached place then. 2016 mass-cull recommended line with law, not evidence-based did result improved profits producers. Appeals supported by scientific evidence from international organizations conservationists effect will production, instead further endanger were ignored. To forestall here elsewhere, matters recognize precursor signs conditions favoured them including stopped. provide rare opportunity strategy used open way propose impactful alternatives or additional actions instead. situation exemplifies eroding commitment conservation, eased withdrawal policy suit short term goals election cycles at expense longer environmental interests.