摘要: In a few cases, such as early pregnancy tests, the test results are dichotomous; many diagnostic however, give which not binary. diagnosis of prostate cancer, prostate-spe...
sagepub.com
sci-hub.se 参考文章(16)
G.P. Steck, W.J. Zimmer, ESTIMATION OF ACCELERATION AND AGEING FUNCTIONS. ,(1972)
ALFRED A. BUCK, JOHN J. GART, COMPARISON OF A SCREENING TEST AND A REFERENCE TEST IN EPIDEMIOLOGIC STUDIES I. INDICES OF AGREEMENT AND THEIR RELATION TO PREVALENCE American Journal of Epidemiology. ,vol. 83, pp. 586- 592 ,(1966) , 10.1093/OXFORDJOURNALS.AJE.A120609
Ting-Chao Chou, Derivation and properties of Michaelis-Menten type and Hill type equations for reference ligands Journal of Theoretical Biology. ,vol. 59, pp. 253- 276 ,(1976) , 10.1016/0022-5193(76)90169-7
A. J. Simpson, M. J. Fitter, What is the best index of detectability Psychological Bulletin. ,vol. 80, pp. 481- 488 ,(1973) , 10.1037/H0035203
Donald Bamber, The area above the ordinal dominance graph and the area below the receiver operating characteristic graph Journal of Mathematical Psychology. ,vol. 12, pp. 387- 415 ,(1975) , 10.1016/0022-2496(75)90001-2
Robert G. Newcombe, Simultaneous comparison of sensitivity and specificity of two tests in the paired design: a straightforward graphical approach Statistics in Medicine. ,vol. 20, pp. 907- 915 ,(2001) , 10.1002/SIM.906
Quinn McNemar, Note on the sampling error of the difference between correlated proportions or percentages. Psychometrika. ,vol. 12, pp. 153- 157 ,(1947) , 10.1007/BF02295996
Colini B. Begg, Advances in statistical methodology for diagnostic medecine ni the 1980's Statistics in Medicine. ,vol. 10, pp. 1887- 1895 ,(1991) , 10.1002/SIM.4780101205
J A Hanley, B J McNeil, A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. Radiology. ,vol. 148, pp. 839- 843 ,(1983) , 10.1148/RADIOLOGY.148.3.6878708
SAM WIEAND, MITCHELL H. GAIL, BARRY R. JAMES, KANG L. JAMES, A family of nonparametric statistics for comparing diagnostic markers with paired or unpaired data Biometrika. ,vol. 76, pp. 585- 592 ,(1989) , 10.1093/BIOMET/76.3.585