Arguing Security: A Framework for Analyzing Security Requirements

作者: Charles B. Haley

DOI:

关键词:

摘要: This book presents a framework for security requirements elicitation and analysis. The is based on constructing context the system, representing as constraints, developing satisfaction arguments requirements. system described using problem-oriented notation, then validated against through construction of argument. argument consists two parts: formal that can meet its requirements, structured informal challenging assumptions in may fail, revealing either requirement cannot be satisfied context, or does not contain sufficient information to develop In this case, designers architects are asked provide additional design resolve problems. evaluated by applying it an analysis within air traffic control technology evaluation project.

参考文章(110)
Tyrone Grandison, Morris Sloman, Trust Management Tools for Internet Applications Lecture Notes in Computer Science. pp. 91- 107 ,(2003) , 10.1007/3-540-44875-6_7
Michael Jackson, The structure of software development thought Springer, London. pp. 228- 253 ,(2006) , 10.1007/1-84628-111-3_12
Jonathan D Moffett, Charles B Haley, Bashar Nuseibeh, Core Security Requirements Artefacts ,(2004)
B. W. Boehm, Verifying and validating software requirements and design specifications Software Risk Management. pp. 205- 218 ,(1989)
Janet E. Burge, David C. Brown, AN INTEGRATED APPROACH FOR SOFTWARE DESIGN CHECKING USING DESIGN RATIONALE Springer, Dordrecht. pp. 557- 575 ,(2004) , 10.1007/978-1-4020-2393-4_29
Anthony Hunter, Making argumentation more believable national conference on artificial intelligence. pp. 269- 274 ,(2004)
Isabel Brito, Ana Moreira, Integrating the NFR framework in a RE model ,(2004)