Laws prohibiting peer distribution of injecting equipment in Australia: A critical analysis of their effects

摘要: Abstract The law is a key site for the production of meanings around ‘problem' drugs in public discourse. In this article, we critically consider material-discursive ‘effects' laws prohibiting peer distribution needles and syringes Australia. Taking regulations governing possession injecting equipment one jurisdiction (New South Wales, Australia) as case study, use Carol Bacchi's poststructuralist approach to policy analysis assumptions presuppositions underpinning legislative regulatory framework, with particular focus on examining discursive , subjectification lived effects these laws. We argue that prohibitions except by ‘authorised persons' within ‘approved programs' constitute people who inject irresponsible, irrational, untrustworthy re-inscribe familiar stereotype drug ‘addict'. These constructions fundamentally constrain how provision may be thought about practice. suggest among peers also have other, material, counterproductive various health aims objectives. However, actions undertaken some distribute their disrupt challenge constructions, through counter-discourse which are constituted active agents vital role play blood-borne virus prevention community. Such activity continues bring it risk criminal prosecution, so remains vexed issue. insights implications relevance beyond Australia, particularly other countries world prohibit distribution, but practices association use.