What About the Bell-shaped Relationship Between Primacy and Development?

作者: André Lemelin , Mario Polèse

DOI: 10.1177/016001769501800303

关键词:

摘要: This paper proposes, estimates, and tests a “no-frills” static two-equation recursive model, where the size of largest city depends on level development in two-step relationship, with total urban population intervening as an intermediate variable. The model has following implications for primacy: (1) contrary to Richardson Schwartz's (1988) assertion, primacy is indeed related development, albeit indirectly, but (2) relationship does not display bell shape predicted by El-Shakhs-Mera hypothesis. Instead, function decreases monotonically at decreasing rate. Research assistance was provided Atib Salhi.

参考文章(13)
Servet Mutlu, Urban Concentration and Primacy Revisited: An Analysis and Some Policy Conclusions Economic Development and Cultural Change. ,vol. 37, pp. 611- 639 ,(1989) , 10.1086/451745
Harry W. Richardson, Gerd Schwartz, Economic development, population and primacy. Regional Studies. ,vol. 22, pp. 467- 475 ,(1988) , 10.1080/00343408812331345140
Gershon Alperovich, Economic Development and Population Concentration Economic Development and Cultural Change. ,vol. 41, pp. 63- 74 ,(1992) , 10.1086/451995
Martin J. Beckmann, City Hierarchies and the Distribution of City Size Economic Development and Cultural Change. ,vol. 6, pp. 243- 248 ,(1958) , 10.1086/449769
Lee De Cola, Statistical Determinants of the Population of a Nation's Largest City Economic Development and Cultural Change. ,vol. 33, pp. 71- 98 ,(1984) , 10.1086/451444
John B. Parr, A note on the size distribution of cities over time Journal of Urban Economics. ,vol. 18, pp. 199- 212 ,(1985) , 10.1016/0094-1190(85)90017-8
Koichi Mera, On the Urban Agglomeration and Economic Efficiency Economic Development and Cultural Change. ,vol. 21, pp. 309- 324 ,(1973) , 10.1086/450630