Criticising the Solitary Mobile Subject: Researching Relational Mobilities and Reflecting on Mobile Methods

作者: Katharina Manderscheid

DOI: 10.1080/17450101.2013.830406

关键词:

摘要: AbstractOne of the key arguments mobilities paradigm is that people’s mobility practices are embedded in their spatial, cultural, political, economical, social and personal context. Yet, empirical research tends to these two sides separately – either subjective sense experience or discursive, spatial structural foundation. Taking this desideratum as point departure, I will make a proposal for researching links between structures consisting application multiple correspondence analysis. This attempts, furthermore, operationalise relational practices, which reinforces networks rather than solitary subjects origin decisions. methodological approach demonstrated by comparative data analysis movement patterns England Switzerland. In final part paper, reflect upon methods quantification mor...

参考文章(91)
Vassilis Monastiriotis, Sub-regional disparities in Britain: convergence, asymmetries and spatial dependence London School of Economics and Political Science. ,(2006)
Andreas Mühlichen, Jörg Blasius, Der „soziale Raum“ der Lebensstile und Prominenten Zwischen Methodenpluralismus und Datenhandel. pp. 113- 139 ,(2008) , 10.1007/978-3-531-91056-7_6
Ben Fincham, Lesley Murray, Mark McGuinness, Introduction to mobile methodologies Palgrave Macmillan. ,(2010)
Tim Schwanen, Karen Lucas, Understanding Auto Motives Emerald Group Publishing Limited. ,(2011) , 10.1108/9780857242341-001
John Urry, Kingsley L. Dennis, After the Car ,(1994)
Michel Foucault, The Order of Things ,(1966)
Karen Lucas, Driving to the Breadline Emerald Group Publishing Limited. ,(2011) , 10.1108/9780857242341-011
Gerardo Meil Landwerlin, Norbert F. Schneider, Relevance and diversity of job-related spatial mobility in six European countries Barbara Budrich Publishers. ,(2008)