摘要: The paper dwells on a judgement model for R&D project evaluation using multifactor criteria based hierarchic considerations. idea is to employ formal tools in quantification of subjective evaluations where expert involved. Comparative priority scale are converted quantities the eigen vector concept. This also essence Analytic Hierarchic Process (AHP) Satty [Satty T L, analytic process (Mc Graw Hill, New York) 1980] which as technique employed evaluation. It argued that AHP more effective than scoring charts and utility models setting judgemental through peer rating.
niscair.res.in参考文章(5)
L Lewis, Setting research priorities California Agriculture. ,vol. 42, pp. 2- 2 ,(1988)
Dennis Costello, A practical approach to R&D project selection Technological Forecasting and Social Change. ,vol. 23, pp. 353- 368 ,(1983) , 10.1016/0040-1625(83)90036-7
Jeffrey K Pinto, Dennis P Slevin, None, Critical factors in successful project implementation IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. ,vol. EM-34, pp. 22- 27 ,(1987) , 10.1109/TEM.1987.6498856
Paul J. H. Schoemaker, C. Carter Waid, An Experimental Comparison of Different Approaches to Determining Weights in Additive Utility Models Management Science. ,vol. 28, pp. 182- 196 ,(1982) , 10.1287/MNSC.28.2.182
Norman R. Baker, R & D project selection models: An assessment IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. pp. 165- 171 ,(1974) , 10.1109/TEM.1974.6448498