BACK TO THE FUTURE Reclaiming Effective Mathematics Assessment Strategies

作者: Gerald Kulm

DOI:

关键词:

摘要: In this article, I describe some efforts initiated about 2 decades ago to reform mathematics assessment. Many, if not most, of those ideas have gradually eroded only from school practice but also the knowledge base current day thinking and research in addition exploring explaining policy, political, economic factors that led demise these ideas, want recall encourage educators reconsider them explore ways they might be adapted implemented once again. It is necessary first provide a brief account developments forces believe status assessment today.More than 20 years ago, edited book titled Assessing Higher Order Thinking Mathematics (Kulm, 1990) which was one attempts by leading experts develop for reforming traditional paper-andpencil, multiple-choice approaches assessing student achievement. book, stated "More comprehensive thoughtful should begin replace simplistic report cards, group comparisons, minimal competency emphasis earlier accountability indicator efforts" (p. 77). The authors chapters addressed issues day, including higher order (Baker), alignment curriculum (Pandey), new frameworks (Romberg, Zarinnia, & Collis), problem solving (Lester Kroll), uses technology (Lesh; Strong; Lipson, Faletti, Martinez). Authors reported on multiple dimensions learning (Nichols, Cobb, Yackel, Wood, Wheatley), schemas (Marshall), quantitative reasoning (McKnight), structured items (Wilson).The inspired part pilot study National Assessment Educational Progress (NAEP), explored provided examples innovative emphasized "hands-on" performance (NAEP, 1987). member team science working with NAEP dozen tasks, group-administered openended problems, "station activities" required students use equipment, "experiments" administered individual investigate discuss findings administrator. tasks assessed skills classifying, observing making inferences, formulating hypotheses, interpreting data. field-tested national sample 1,000 third, seventh, eleventh grade students. results indicated conducting hands-on "feasible extremely worthwhile" 7). Participating teachers administrators were enthusiastic promise information obtainable through types tasks.As momentum grew teachers, schools, states began test them. Various terms assessments appear: authentic, performance, alternative. Grants federal government became available (e. g. Kulm, 1994c), train their Telese, McMullen, 1993), do effectiveness (e.g., 1994a, 1994b). At same time, several experimented with, as state achievement measures. There sense, parallel reforms standards movements (National Council Teachers Mathematics, 1989), ment could reflect reinforce goals leam procedures mathematics, concepts, processes, applications are essential modem world (Mathematics Science Education Board, 1993; Webb, 1993). …

参考文章(36)
Michael C. Rodriguez, The Role of Classroom Assessment in Student Performance on TIMSS Applied Measurement in Education. ,vol. 17, pp. 1- 24 ,(2004) , 10.1207/S15324818AME1701_1
Richard J. Stiggins, Design and Development of Performance Assessments Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice. ,vol. 6, pp. 33- 42 ,(1987) , 10.1111/J.1745-3992.1987.TB00507.X
Margarida Fernandes, David Fontana, Changes in control beliefs in Portuguese primary school pupils as a consequence of the employment of self‐assessment strategies British Journal of Educational Psychology. ,vol. 66, pp. 301- 313 ,(1996) , 10.1111/J.2044-8279.1996.TB01199.X
Anthony W. Lorsbach, Kenneth Tobin, Carol Briscoe, Sarah Ulerick LaMaster, An interpretation of assessment methods in middle school science International Journal of Science Education. ,vol. 14, pp. 305- 317 ,(1992) , 10.1080/0950069920140307
Meixia Ding, Xiaobao Li, Diana Piccolo, Gerald Kulm, Teacher Interventions in Cooperative-Learning Mathematics Classes Journal of Educational Research. ,vol. 100, pp. 162- 175 ,(2007) , 10.3200/JOER.100.3.162-175
John Clarke, Classroom dialogue and science achievement Research in Science Education. ,vol. 18, pp. 83- 94 ,(1988) , 10.1007/BF02356583
Thomas P. Carpenter, Elizabeth Fennema, Megan L. Franke, Cognitively Guided Instruction: A Knowledge Base for Reform in Primary Mathematics Instruction The Elementary School Journal. ,vol. 97, pp. 3- 20 ,(1996) , 10.1086/461846
Gaea Leinhardt, James G. Greeno, The cognitive skill of teaching. Journal of Educational Psychology. ,vol. 78, pp. 75- 95 ,(1986) , 10.1037/0022-0663.78.2.75
James Telese, Gerald Kulm, Mathematics assessment scenarios for at-risk students The Urban Review. ,vol. 27, pp. 121- 140 ,(1995) , 10.1007/BF02354359
Mary Lee Smith, Claire Rottenberg, Unintended Consequences of External Testing in Elementary Schools Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice. ,vol. 10, pp. 7- 11 ,(1991) , 10.1111/J.1745-3992.1991.TB00210.X