RANDOMISED TRIAL OF STRUCTURED ANTENATAL TRAINING SESSIONS TO IMPROVE THE BIRTH PROCESS

作者: J Dürr , M Væth , J Olsen , J Olsen , RD Maimburg

DOI: 10.1111/J.1471-0528.2010.02584.X

关键词:

摘要: Please cite this paper as: Maimburg R, Vaeth M, Durr J, Hvidman L, Olsen J. Randomised trial of structured antenatal training sessions to improve the birth process. BJOG 2010;117:921–928. Objective  To compare process in nulliparous women enrolled a programme, ‘The Ready for Child’ with allocated routine care. Design  A randomised controlled trial. Setting  Danish university hospital. Participants  Thousand hundred and ninety-three women, recruited before week 22 + 0. Methods  Compliance protocol was monitored by questionnaires sent email, data from local cohort database. Data were analysed according ‘intention-to-treat’ principle. Intervention  Women receive 9 hours or no formalised training. Of 1193 603 intervention group 590 reference group. Main outcome measures  Cervix dilatation on arrival at maternity ward, use pain relief medical interventions during process, women’s experience. Results  who attended ‘Ready programme arrived ward active labour more often than [relative risk (RR) 1.45, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.26–1.65, P < 0.01], they used less epidural analgesia (RR 0.84, CI 0.73–0.97, P < 0.01) but not overall 0.99, 0.94–1.04, P < 0.72). Medical self-reported experiences similar two groups. We found adverse effects intervention. Conclusion  Attending may help cope better Adverse are few, if any.

参考文章(21)
Patton Ll, English Ec, Hambleton Jd, Childbirth preparation and outcomes of labor and delivery in primiparous women. Journal of Family Practice. ,vol. 20, pp. 375- ,(1985)
O'Donnell S, Fisher A, Lloyd P, Gunn Tr, Antenatal education: does it improve the quality of labour and delivery? The New Zealand Medical Journal. ,vol. 96, pp. 51- ,(1983)
Educacion maternal y reconocimiento del inicio del parto Anales Del Sistema Sanitario De Navarra. ,vol. 23, pp. 337- 342 ,(2009) , 10.23938/ASSN.0770
Anita J Gagnon, Jane Sandall, Individual or group antenatal education for childbirth or parenthood, or both Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. ,vol. 2007, ,(2007) , 10.1002/14651858.CD002869.PUB2
Jane Svensson, Lesley Barclay, Margaret Cooke, Randomised-controlled trial of two antenatal education programmes Midwifery. ,vol. 25, pp. 114- 125 ,(2009) , 10.1016/J.MIDW.2006.12.012
Jun Zhang, James F. Troendle, Michael K. Yancey, Reassessing the labor curve in nulliparous women. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. ,vol. 187, pp. 824- 828 ,(2002) , 10.1067/MOB.2002.127142
Diane Escott, Helen Spiby, Pauline Slade, Robert B Fraser, The range of coping strategies women use to manage pain and anxiety prior to and during first experience of labour Midwifery. ,vol. 20, pp. 144- 156 ,(2004) , 10.1016/J.MIDW.2003.11.001
R. Mehdizadeh, A., Roosta, F., Chaichian, S., Alaghehbandan, Evaluation of the impact of birth preparation courses on the health of the mother and the newborn. American Journal of Perinatology. ,vol. 22, pp. 7- 9 ,(2005) , 10.1055/S-2004-837738
Selina Redman, Stephanie Oak, Peggy Booth, Jean Jensen, Anne Saxton, Evaluation of an Antenatal Education Programme: Characteristics of Attenders, Changes in Knowledge and Satisfaction of Participants The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. ,vol. 31, pp. 310- 316 ,(1991) , 10.1111/J.1479-828X.1991.TB02809.X