The MiLA tool: Modeling greenhouse gas emissions and cumulative energy demand of energy crop cultivation in rotation

作者: Christiane Peter , Xenia Specka , Joachim Aurbacher , Peter Kornatz , Christiane Herrmann

DOI: 10.1016/J.AGSY.2016.12.008

关键词:

摘要: Abstract Crop rotations are part of current agricultural practice, since they and their effects can contribute to a sustainable cropping system. However, in Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) studies, crop rotation insufficiently considered, these difficult measure. LCA studies from production typically take only one vegetation period into account. As result, the consideration how assessed is influenced by previous (crop effects) including: (1) nutrient carryover, (2) reduction operational requirements (3) different intensity timing farming activities, outside system boundary. ignoring may lead incorrect interpretation results consequently poor management as well policy decisions. A new tool called “Model for integrative Agriculture (MiLA)” presented this work. MiLA has been developed assess GHG emissions cumulative energy demands (CED) systems taking characteristics cultivation This enables user analyze at farm level order identify mitigation options energy-efficient systems. The was applied case study, including two regions Germany with goal demonstrating effectiveness on results. Results show that influence emission result individual − 34% up + 99% CED − 16 + 89%. Expanding boundary whole account providing based functional units improves helps those making assessment draw more realistic picture interactions between crops while increasing reliability

参考文章(45)
K. Hasler, S. Bröring, S.W.F. Omta, H.-W. Olfs, Life cycle assessment (LCA) of different fertilizer product types European Journal of Agronomy. ,vol. 69, pp. 41- 51 ,(2015) , 10.1016/J.EJA.2015.06.001
Thomas F Stocker, Dahe Qin, G-K Plattner, Melinda MB Tignor, Simon K Allen, Judith Boschung, Alexander Nauels, Yu Xia, Vincent Bex, Pauline M Midgley, Climate change 2007 : the physical science basis : contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Published in <b>2007</b> in Cambridge by Cambridge university press. ,(2007) , 10.1017/CBO9781107415324
P.W.R. Adams, W.G. Mezzullo, M.C. McManus, Biomass sustainability criteria: Greenhouse gas accounting issues for biogas and biomethane facilities Energy Policy. ,vol. 87, pp. 95- 109 ,(2015) , 10.1016/J.ENPOL.2015.08.031
Pål Börjesson, Thomas Prade, Mikael Lantz, Lovisa Björnsson, Energy Crop-Based Biogas as Vehicle Fuel—The Impact of Crop Selection on Energy Efficiency and Greenhouse Gas Performance Energies. ,vol. 8, pp. 6033- 6058 ,(2015) , 10.3390/EN8066033
Gerhard Brankatschk, Matthias Finkbeiner, Modeling crop rotation in agricultural LCAs — Challenges and potential solutions Agricultural Systems. ,vol. 138, pp. 66- 76 ,(2015) , 10.1016/J.AGSY.2015.05.008
A. F. Bouwman, L. J. M. Boumans, N. H. Batjes, Modeling global annual N2O and NO emissions from fertilized fields Global Biogeochemical Cycles. ,vol. 16, pp. 28-1- 28-9 ,(2002) , 10.1029/2001GB001812
Luis López-Bellido, Jacques Wery, Rafael J. López-Bellido, Energy crops: Prospects in the context of sustainable agriculture European Journal of Agronomy. ,vol. 60, pp. 1- 12 ,(2014) , 10.1016/J.EJA.2014.07.001
Jonathan Hillier, Frank Brentrup, Martin Wattenbach, Christof Walter, Tirma Garcia-Suarez, Llorenç Mila-i-Canals, Pete Smith, Which cropland greenhouse gas mitigation options give the greatest benefits in different world regions? Climate and soil‐specific predictions from integrated empirical models Global Change Biology. ,vol. 18, pp. 1880- 1894 ,(2012) , 10.1111/J.1365-2486.2012.02671.X
Pål Börjesson, Linda M. Tufvesson, Agricultural crop-based biofuels – resource efficiency and environmental performance including direct land use changes Journal of Cleaner Production. ,vol. 19, pp. 108- 120 ,(2011) , 10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2010.01.001