Individual motivations for limiting meat consumption

作者: Ifat Zur , Christian A. Klöckner

DOI: 10.1108/BFJ-08-2012-0193

关键词:

摘要: Purpose – The aim of this paper is to identify predictors of meat consumption and the intention to reduce it. Since meat consumption is one of the major contributors to human made environmental destruction including climate change, biodiversity loss or water and air pollution and at the same time under volitional control meat consumption is an interesting target for interventions. Design/methodology/approach – An integrated model was derived from the theory of planned behaviour, the norm activation theory and the protection motivation theory which was tested in a paper-pencil based questionnaire study including self-reported meat consumption was conducted with a convenience sample of 210 adult inhabitants of Trondheim (Norway). Findings – The model was confirmed to a large extent. Meat consumption was predicted strongly by meat eating habits, but also negatively by reduction intentions. Reduction intentions were determined by attitudes, moral beliefs and health beliefs. Moral beliefs were predicted by injunctive and descriptive norms as well as perceived behavioural control. Research limitations/implications – The study was based on a convenience sample, thus the sample is not representative. Furthermore, some of the measurement instruments are of only mediocre quality. Practical implications – The results show that interventions to reduce meat consumption need to include habits braking components to be effective. Meat consumption reduction is motivated by a broad array of motivations, including morality and health. Intervention campaigns need to cover this spectrum. Originality/value – This study is one of the first that systematically analyses determinants of meat consumption which makes it valuable in spite of its limitations.

参考文章(48)
Edward L Deci, Richard M Ryan, PAM Van Lange, Arie W Kruglanski, E Tory Higgins, Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology ,(2011)
João Graça, Maria Manuela Calheiros, Abílio Oliveira, Attached to meat? (Un)Willingness and intentions to adopt a more plant-based diet Appetite. ,vol. 95, pp. 113- 125 ,(2015) , 10.1016/J.APPET.2015.06.024
Christian A. Klöckner, Should I Buy Organic Food? A Psychological Perspective on Purchase Decisions Organic food and agriculture: new trends and developments in the social sciences.. ,(2012) , 10.5772/1526
Joan Sabaté, The contribution of vegetarian diets to health and disease: a paradigm shift? The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. ,vol. 78, ,(2003) , 10.1093/AJCN/78.3.502S
Linda Steg, Judith I. M. de Groot, Agnes E. van den Berg, Environmental Psychology: An Introduction Blackwell publishing. ,(2012)
John Thøgersen, Norms for environmentally responsible behaviour: An extended taxonomy Journal of Environmental Psychology. ,vol. 26, pp. 247- 261 ,(2006) , 10.1016/J.JENVP.2006.09.004
Paul Harland, Henk Staats, Henk A. M. Wilke, Explaining Proenvironmental Intention and Behavior by Personal Norms and the Theory of Planned Behavior1 Journal of Applied Social Psychology. ,vol. 29, pp. 2505- 2528 ,(1999) , 10.1111/J.1559-1816.1999.TB00123.X
Arnold Tukker, Bart Jansen, None, Environmental Impacts of Products: A Detailed Review of Studies Journal of Industrial Ecology. ,vol. 10, pp. 159- 182 ,(2006) , 10.1162/JIEC.2006.10.3.159