作者: C. Cayrol , F. Dupin de Saint-Cyr , M. Lagasquie-Schiex
DOI: 10.1613/JAIR.2965
关键词:
摘要: In this paper, we address the problem of change in an abstract argumentation system. We focus on a particular change: addition new argument which interacts with previous arguments. study impact such outcome system, more particularly set its extensions. Several properties for operation are defined by comparing extensions to initial one, these called "structural" when comparisons based set-cardinality or set-inclusion relations. other proposed where status some arguments: accepted arguments; refer "evolution status" during change, e.g., Monotony and Priority Recency. All may be less desirable according specific applications. They studied under two semantics: grounded preferred semantics.