Learning from errors in dual vocational education: video-enhanced instructional strategies

作者: Alberto A.P. Cattaneo , Elena Boldrini

DOI: 10.1108/JWL-01-2017-0006

关键词:

摘要: Purpose Starting from the identification of some theoretically driven instructional principles, this paper presents a set empirical cases based on strategies to learn errors. The purpose is provide first evidence about feasibility and effectiveness for learning video-enhanced error-based in vocational education training. Design/methodology/approach Four different are presented. All them share same design-based research perspective, which teachers researchers co-designed an (iterative) intervention field. Two preliminary investigations, while other two profit quasi-experimental design with at least one experimental condition error treatment control group. Findings The four show (and analysis). More specifically, they validity flexible adoption specific principles derived literature review: use inductive particular, worked-out examples; reference concrete, possibly personal, experience analysis task; prompted writing elicit self-explanations reflection; video recording annotating situation be analysed. Research limitations/implications The constitute only starting point further into errors procedural learning. Moreover, presented focused domain knowledge not that declarative knowledge. Further studies training sector might serve area. Practical implications The provides concrete indications directions implement effective errors, especially within education. Social implications Errors often identified attributed (individual) failures. In both institutions workplace, can engender intolerant closed climate towards mistakes, preventing real professional development personal growth. Interventions schools workplaces play role changing such culture creating tolerant positive attitude them. Originality/value The majority disciplinary academic contexts. present contributed filling gap related initial education, because deal dual field development. contribution relies annotation as support specifically enhances working procedures.

参考文章(35)
Inger Marie Dalehefte, Tina Seidel, Manfred Prenzel, Reflecting on Learning from Errors in School Instruction: Findings and Suggestions from a Swiss-German Video Study Springer, Dordrecht. pp. 197- 213 ,(2012) , 10.1007/978-90-481-3941-5_12
Shmuel Ellis, Learning from Errors: The Role of After-Event Reviews Springer, Dordrecht. pp. 215- 232 ,(2012) , 10.1007/978-90-481-3941-5_13
Martin Gartmeier, Elke M. Schüttelkopf, Tracing Outcomes of Learning from Errors on the Level of Knowledge Springer, Dordrecht. pp. 33- 51 ,(2012) , 10.1007/978-90-481-3941-5_3
John Hattie, Mark Gan, None, INSTRUCTION BASED ON FEEDBACK Routledge Handbooks Online. pp. 263- 285 ,(2010) , 10.4324/9780203839089-22
John Hattie, Gregory CR Yates, None, Visible Learning and the Science of How We Learn ,(2013)
Dieter Zapf, Michael Frese, Action as the core of work psychology: A German approach. Consulting Psychologists Press. ,(1994)
Wangari Mwangi, John Sweller, Learning to Solve Compare Word Problems: The Effect of Example Format and Generating Self-Explanations Cognition and Instruction. ,vol. 16, pp. 173- 199 ,(1998) , 10.1207/S1532690XCI1602_2
Shmuel Ellis, Inbar Davidi, After-Event Reviews: Drawing Lessons From Successful and Failed Experience. Journal of Applied Psychology. ,vol. 90, pp. 857- 871 ,(2005) , 10.1037/0021-9010.90.5.857