作者: Hisato Takagi , Yosuke Hari , Kouki Nakashima , Toshiki Kuno , Tomo Ando
DOI: 10.1016/J.JJCC.2019.06.014
关键词:
摘要: Abstract Background To compare early outcomes after robotic versus conventional mitral valve surgery (R-MVS C-MVS), we performed a meta-analysis of currently available propensity score matched (PSM) studies. Methods identify all PSM studies R-MVS C-MVS, PubMed and Web Science were searched thorough November 2018 using the terms or robot, mitral, propensity. Inclusion criteria isolated C-MVS. Odds ratios dichotomous data mean differences for continuous generated each study combined in random-effects model. Results We identified 7 C-MVS enrolling total 3764 patients. Pooled analyses demonstrated significantly longer cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) (p Conclusions ICU/hospital stay was shorter RBC transfusion/prolonged ventilation/AF less frequent than despite CPB cross-clamp time The other including all-cause mortality similarly