The Geomechanics Of A Shale Play: What Makes A Shale Prospective

作者: Larry Kevin Britt , Jerry Schoeffler

DOI: 10.2118/125525-MS

关键词:

摘要: Many shale plays are being successfully developed throughout North America. These evaluated based on a number of criteria, but primarily through typical unconventional and tight formation gas reservoir characteristics. Prospective share several interesting characteristics such as mineralogy, rock mechanics, geomechanics. It is the intent this paper to highlight demonstrate interrelationship these characteristics, show their importance completion stimulation design more importantly very prospectivity an play. This will first show, analysis that made up mostly silica carbonate material have few clay constituents. In other words, prospective shales actually fine-grained clastics not shale!Second, tend be brittle, with static Young’s Modulus generally in excess 3.5 x 10 6 psi. Of course, brittleness related lack constituents make rocks. addition, satisfy clastic correlations dynamic Modulus. They do behave like shales, finegrained isotropic (on core scale) clastics! Finally, can flow induced fractures or natural fissures under effective stress conditions plays. As result, water-frac treatments choice! However, proppant still necessary at least near wellbore vicinity provide conductive pathway wellbore.This focuses three key elements (mineralogy, geomechanics) benefits petroleum industry by: 1. Integrating laboratory work multi-disciplinary data develop evaluation tool, 2. Illustrating how dataset influences design, execution, well performance, 3. Demonstrating multi-discipline used identify mitigate risks reservoirs.

参考文章(18)
Joseph H Frantz, JR Williamson, WK Sawyer, D Johnston, G Waters, LP Moore, RJ MacDonald, M Pearcy, SV Ganpule, KS March, Evaluating Barnett Shale Production Performance-Using an Integrated Approach SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. ,(2005) , 10.2118/96917-MS
Michael J. Mayerhofer, Ray N. Walker, Ted Urbancic, James T. Rutledge, East Texas Hydraulic Fracture Imaging Project: Measuring Hydraulic Fracture Growth of Conventional Sandfracs and Waterfracs SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. ,(2000) , 10.2118/63034-MS
Ray N. Walker, Jeffery L. Hunter, Al C. Brake, Paul A. Fagin, Nick Steinsberger, Proppants, We Still Don't Need No Proppants - A Perspective of Several Operators SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. ,(1998) , 10.2118/49106-MS
C.N. Fredd, S.B. McConnell, C.L. Boney, K.W. England, Experimental Study of Hydraulic Fracture Conductivity Demonstrates the Benefits of Using Proppants SPE Rocky Mountain Regional/Low-Permeability Reservoirs Symposium and Exhibition. ,(2000) , 10.2118/60326-MS
R.H. Morales, R.P. Marcinew, Fracturing of High-Permeability Formations: Mechanical Properties Correlations Software - Practice and Experience. ,(1993) , 10.2118/26561-MS
Lewis L. Lacy, Dynamic rock mechanics testing for optimized fracture designs Software - Practice and Experience. pp. 23- 36 ,(1997) , 10.2118/38716-MS
David J. Jacobi, Mikhail Gladkikh, Brian LeCompte, Gabor Hursan, Freddy Mendez, John Longo, Seehong Ong, Matt Bratovich, George Larry Patton, Phillip Shoemaker, Integrated Petrophysical Evaluation of Shale Gas Reservoirs CIPC/SPE Gas Technology Symposium 2008 Joint Conference. ,(2008) , 10.2118/114925-MS
Rick Rickman, Michael J. Mullen, James Erik Petre, William Vincent Grieser, Donald Kundert, A Practical Use of Shale Petrophysics for Stimulation Design Optimization: All Shale Plays Are Not Clones of the Barnett Shale SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. ,(2008) , 10.2118/115258-MS