作者: Nancy Puttkammer , Kenny Pettersen , Nathaelf Hyppolite , Garilus France , Jean Solon Valles
DOI: 10.1016/J.HLPT.2016.11.006
关键词:
摘要: Abstract Objectives The aim of this case study was to compare two alternative strategies for prioritizing data elements quality assessment (DQA) in a routine health management information system. used from iSante, multi-site electronic medical record implemented by the Haitian Ministry Health. We described and compared prioritization strategies: (1) Delphi process drawing iterative feedback clinicians stakeholders responsible monitoring evaluation (ME (2) using burden disease estimates Haiti establish priorities on primary care patients. Methods included 26 individuals across 6 institutions, including M&E specialists. Through three rounds questionnaires, provided input 13 indicators completeness, accuracy timeliness HIV data. revealed that cardiovascular contributed greatest number disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs). This resulted selection 16 Results Both methods informed definition set automated queries assess internal validity, logic clinical plausibility. benefited stakeholder input, but lengthy process. objective easier implement, lacked buy-in. Conclusions A hybrid approach guided both may be most beneficial DQA.