Obtaining sensitive information from a wary population: A comparison of telephone and face-to-face surveys of welfare recipients in the United States

作者: William Alex Pridemore , Kelly R. Damphousse , Rebecca K. Moore

DOI: 10.1016/J.SOCSCIMED.2005.01.006

关键词:

摘要: Recent studies reveal the benefits of technological developments such as audio computer assisted self-interviewing (A-CASI) in interview methodology, especially for surveys sensitive behavior and information. However, we believe that selection mode administration depends not only on technology available interest, but also specific population under study. We therefore assess survey effects reported rates alcohol drug use among welfare recipients, an important group scholars public health agencies. The sample consisted adult recipients Temporary Assistance to Needy Families (TANF) Oklahoma, January 2001. Adjusting demographic characteristics, employment, education, employ odds ratios compare 30-day, 1 year, lifetime prevalence estimates from telephone face-to-face surveys. Telephone methodology yields similar or higher alcohol, marijuana, hard abuse, though lower recent use. discuss our findings relation underfunded agencies must efficiently respond local levels abuse conclude may depend upon

参考文章(32)
THOMAS W. MANGIONE, RALPH HINGSON, JANE BARRETT, Collecting Sensitive Data: A Comparison of Three Survey Strategies Sociological Methods & Research. ,vol. 10, pp. 337- 346 ,(1982) , 10.1177/0049124182010003006
William S. Aquilino, Leonard A. Lo Sciuto, Effects of Interview Mode on Self-Reported Drug Use Public Opinion Quarterly. ,vol. 54, pp. 362- 393 ,(1990) , 10.1086/269212
Theresa E. Perlis, Don C. Des Jarlais, Samuel R. Friedman, Kamyar Arasteh, Charles F. Turner, Audio-computerized self-interviewing versus face-to-face interviewing for research data collection at drug abuse treatment programs. Addiction. ,vol. 99, pp. 885- 896 ,(2004) , 10.1111/J.1360-0443.2004.00740.X
William S. Aquilino, Debra L. Wright, SUBSTANCE USE ESTIMATES FROM RDD AND AREA PROBABILITY SAMPLES IMPACT OF DIFFERENTIAL SCREENING METHODS AND UNIT NONRESPONSE Public Opinion Quarterly. ,vol. 60, pp. 563- 573 ,(1996) , 10.1086/297773
Thomas K. Greenfield, Lorraine T. Midanik, John D. Rogers, Effects of telephone versus face-to-face interview modes on reports of alcohol consumption. Addiction. ,vol. 95, pp. 277- 284 ,(2000) , 10.1046/J.1360-0443.2000.95227714.X
Aurora P. Jackson, Andre Ivanoff, Reduction of low response rates in interview surveys of poor African-American families Journal of Social Service Research. ,vol. 25, pp. 41- 60 ,(1998) , 10.1300/J079V25N01_03
Mick P. Couper, Benjamin Rowe, EVALUATION OF A COMPUTER-ASSISTED SELF-INTERVIEW COMPONENT IN A COMPUTER-ASSISTED PERSONAL INTERVIEW SURVEY Public Opinion Quarterly. ,vol. 60, pp. 89- 105 ,(1996) , 10.1086/297740
Ronald Czaja, Asking Sensitive Behavioral Questions in Telephone Interviews International Quarterly of Community Health Education. ,vol. 8, pp. 23- 32 ,(1987) , 10.2190/XT6W-31CX-TD87-E643
Karin V. Rhodes, Diane S. Lauderdale, Theresa He, David S. Howes, Wendy Levinson, "Between me and the computer": increased detection of intimate partner violence using a computer questionnaire. Annals of Emergency Medicine. ,vol. 40, pp. 476- 484 ,(2002) , 10.1067/MEM.2002.127181
Stanley Presser, Robert M. Groves, Paul M. Biemer, Lars E. Lyberg, James T. Massey, William L. Nicholls, Joseph Waksberg, Telephone survey methodology Contemporary Sociology. ,vol. 19, pp. 324- ,(1990) , 10.2307/2072660