Public perceptions on robotic surgery, hospitals with robots, and surgeons that use them.

作者: Joshua A. Boys , Evan T. Alicuben , Michael J. DeMeester , Stephanie G. Worrell , Daniel S. Oh

DOI: 10.1007/S00464-015-4368-6

关键词:

摘要: The use of robotic-assisted surgery (RS) has rapidly increased, but public perceptions about RS are largely unknown. aim this study was to gain insight into RS, hospitals that have robots, and surgeons them. A Web-based survey distributed worldwide. Surveys were collected from July September 2014, those with 50 % or greater completion used for analysis. There 789 surveys, 747 (95 %) mean age respondents 38.5 years. Most (94 %) the USA. Over half (53 %) had a background in health care, 13 % physicians. majority (86 %) previously heard almost 25 % indicated like open, laser, scarless surgery. 20 % robot some degree autonomy during (72 %) safer, faster, less painful offered better results, when asked if they would choose 55 % prefer conventional minimally invasive Hospitals thought be by 53 % respondents. Fewer physicians perceived advantages (30 % vs 78 % non-physicians p < 0.001), fewer needed (30 49 % p = 0.001). One-half remote renowned expert never met over having local non-expert surgeon. benefits still preferred necessary. Misperceptions indicate need patient education prior RS. Interest might allow do complex procedures without necessitating regionalization care. Issues identified merit further exploration.

参考文章(12)
Naomi Lee, Robotic surgery: where are we now? The Lancet. ,vol. 384, pp. 1417- ,(2014) , 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61851-1
J. Shibata, S. Ishihara, N. Tada, K. Kawai, N. H. Tsuno, H. Yamaguchi, E. Sunami, J. Kitayama, T. Watanabe, Surgical stress response after colorectal resection: a comparison of robotic, laparoscopic, and open surgery Techniques in Coloproctology. ,vol. 19, pp. 275- 280 ,(2015) , 10.1007/S10151-014-1263-4
M. Morino, G. Benincà, G. Giraudo, G. M. Del Genio, F. Rebecchi, C. Garrone, Robot-assisted vs laparoscopic adrenalectomy: a prospective randomized controlled trial Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques. ,vol. 18, pp. 1742- 1746 ,(2004) , 10.1007/S00464-004-9046-Z
Kevin C. Zorn, Ofer N. Gofrit, Marcelo A. Orvieto, Albert A. Mikhail, R. Matthew Galocy, Arieh L. Shalhav, Gregory P. Zagaja, Da Vinci robot error and failure rates: single institution experience on a single three-arm robot unit of more than 700 consecutive robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomies. Journal of Endourology. ,vol. 21, pp. 1341- 1344 ,(2007) , 10.1089/END.2006.0455
Dharam Kaushik, Robin High, Curtis J Clark, Chad A LaGrange, None, Malfunction of the Da Vinci robotic system during robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: an international survey. Journal of Endourology. ,vol. 24, pp. 571- 575 ,(2010) , 10.1089/END.2009.0489
Abhijit Shaligram, Jayaraj Unnirevi, Anton Simorov, Vishal M. Kothari, Dmitry Oleynikov, How does the robot affect outcomes? A retrospective review of open, laparoscopic, and robotic Heller myotomy for achalasia. Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques. ,vol. 26, pp. 1047- 1050 ,(2012) , 10.1007/S00464-011-1994-5
Gabriel I. Barbash, Sherry A. Glied, New Technology and Health Care Costs — The Case of Robot-Assisted Surgery New England Journal of Medicine. ,vol. 363, pp. 701- 704 ,(2010) , 10.1056/NEJMP1006602
Celine Lönnerfors, Petur Reynisson, Jan Persson, A randomized trial comparing vaginal and laparoscopic hysterectomy vs robot-assisted hysterectomy Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology. ,vol. 22, pp. 78- 86 ,(2015) , 10.1016/J.JMIG.2014.07.010
Francesco Porpiglia, Ivano Morra, Marco Lucci Chiarissi, Matteo Manfredi, Fabrizio Mele, Susanna Grande, Francesca Ragni, Massimiliano Poggio, Cristian Fiori, Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing Laparoscopic and Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy European Urology. ,vol. 63, pp. 606- 614 ,(2013) , 10.1016/J.EURURO.2012.07.007