Predicting the acceptability and likelihood of lying: The interaction of personality with type of lie

作者: Beverly A. McLeod , Randy L. Genereux

DOI: 10.1016/J.PAID.2008.06.015

关键词:

摘要: The present study investigated the role of individual differences in perceived acceptability and likelihood different types lies. Two-hundred eighty seven college students completed scales assessing six personality variables (honesty, kindness, assertiveness, approval motivation, self-monitoring, Machiavellianism) rated 16 scenarios involving lies told for four motives (altruistic, conflict avoidance, social acceptance, self-gain lies). Our central hypothesis that lying would be predicted by interactions between characteristics rater type lie being considered was supported. For each lie, a unique set significantly likelihood.

参考文章(23)
Julius Kuhl, Jürgen Beckmann, Action control : from cognition to behavior Springer-Verlag. ,(1985)
Phillip R. Shaver, John P. Robinson, Lawrence S. Wrightsman, Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes Academic Press. ,(1991)
Lynsey F. Gozna, Aldert Vrij, Ray Bull, The impact of individual differences on perceptions of lying in everyday life and in a high stake situation Personality and Individual Differences. ,vol. 31, pp. 1203- 1216 ,(2001) , 10.1016/S0191-8869(00)00219-1
Esther Backbier, Johan Hoogstraten, Katharina Meerum Terwogt-Kouwenhoven, Situational Determinants of the Acceptability of Telling Lies1 Journal of Applied Social Psychology. ,vol. 27, pp. 1048- 1062 ,(1997) , 10.1111/J.1559-1816.1997.TB00286.X
John Finley Scott, William A. Scott, Ruth Scott, Values and organizations : a study of fraternities and sororities American Sociological Review. ,vol. 30, pp. 971- ,(1965) , 10.2307/2091006
Ronald E. Riggio, Howard S. Friedman, Individual Differences and Cues to Deception Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. ,vol. 45, pp. 899- 915 ,(1983) , 10.1037/0022-3514.45.4.899
Harry J. Martin, A revised measure of approval motivation and its relationship to social desirability. Journal of Personality Assessment. ,vol. 48, pp. 508- 519 ,(1984) , 10.1207/S15327752JPA4805_10