Progression and treatment rates using an active surveillance protocol incorporating image-guided baseline biopsies and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging monitoring for men with favourable-risk prostate cancer.

作者: David Thurtle , Tristan Barrett , Vineetha Thankappan-Nair , Brendan Koo , Anne Warren

DOI: 10.1111/BJU.14166

关键词:

摘要: OBJECTIVE To assess early outcomes since the introduction of an active surveillance (AS) protocol incorporating multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI)-guided baseline biopsies and image-based surveillance. PATIENTS AND METHODS A new AS mandating image-guided biopsies, annual mpMRI 3-monthly prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing, but which retained re-biopsies, was tested. Pathological progression, treatment conversion triggers for non-protocol biopsy were recorded prospectively. RESULTS Data from 157 men enrolled in (median age 64 years, PSA 6.8 ng/mL, follow-up 39 months) interrogated. total 12 (7.6%) left programme by choice. Of 145 who remained, 104 had re-biopsies either triggered a rise level, change findings or protocol. Overall, 23 (15.9%) experienced disease progression; pathological changes observed 20 results three men. these men, 17 switched to treatment, giving rate 11.7% (<4% per year). with this detected four them after increase re-biopsy, while 10 progression change. Progression six however, solely re-biopsy without prior changes. Using alone detect found have sensitivity specificity 70.0% 81.7%, respectively. CONCLUSION Our protocol, thorough assessment imaging-based surveillance, showed low rates conversion. Changes principle trigger detecting pathologically; still significant number progressions

参考文章(33)
Jeffrey C Weinreb, Jelle O Barentsz, Peter L Choyke, Francois Cornud, Masoom A Haider, Katarzyna J Macura, Daniel Margolis, Mitchell D Schnall, Faina Shtern, Clare M Tempany, Harriet C Thoeny, Sadna Verma, None, PI-RADS Prostate Imaging – Reporting and Data System: 2015, Version 2 European Urology. ,vol. 69, pp. 16- 40 ,(2016) , 10.1016/J.EURURO.2015.08.052
Leonard P Bokhorst, Arnout R Alberts, Antti Rannikko, Riccardo Valdagni, Tom Pickles, Yoshiyuki Kakehi, Chris H Bangma, Monique J Roobol, PRIAS Study Group, Compliance Rates with the Prostate Cancer Research International Active Surveillance (PRIAS) Protocol and Disease Reclassification in Noncompliers European Urology. ,vol. 68, pp. 814- 821 ,(2015) , 10.1016/J.EURURO.2015.06.012
David C. Greenberg, Artitaya Lophatananon, Karen A. Wright, Kenneth R. Muir, Vincent J. Gnanapragasam, Trends and outcome from radical therapy for primary non-metastatic prostate cancer in a UK population PLOS ONE. ,vol. 10, ,(2015) , 10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0119494
Nicholas J. van As, Andrew R. Norman, Karen Thomas, Vincent S. Khoo, Alan Thompson, Robert A. Huddart, Alan Horwich, David P. Dearnaley, Christopher C. Parker, Predicting the Probability of Deferred Radical Treatment for Localised Prostate Cancer Managed by Active Surveillance European Urology. ,vol. 54, pp. 1297- 1305 ,(2008) , 10.1016/J.EURURO.2008.02.039
Simon L. Conti, Marc Dall'Era, Vincent Fradet, Janet E. Cowan, Jeffery Simko, Peter R. Carroll, Pathological Outcomes of Candidates for Active Surveillance of Prostate Cancer Journal of Urology. ,vol. 181, pp. 1628- 1634 ,(2009) , 10.1016/J.JURO.2008.11.107
Marc C. Smaldone, Janet E. Cowan, Peter R. Carroll, Benjamin J. Davies, Eligibility for Active Surveillance and Pathological Outcomes for Men Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy in a Large, Community Based Cohort Journal of Urology. ,vol. 183, pp. 138- 144 ,(2010) , 10.1016/J.JURO.2009.08.152
Roderick C.N. van den Bergh, Hanna Vasarainen, Henk G. van der Poel, Jenneke J. Vis-Maters, John B. Rietbergen, Tom Pickles, Erik B. Cornel, Riccardo Valdagni, Joris J. Jaspars, John van der Hoeven, Frederic Staerman, Eric H.G.M. Oomens, Antti Rannikko, Stijn Roemeling, Ewout W. Steyerberg, Monique J. Roobol, Fritz H. Schröder, Chris H. Bangma, Short-term outcomes of the prospective multicentre ‘Prostate Cancer Research International: Active Surveillance’ study BJU International. ,vol. 105, pp. 956- 962 ,(2010) , 10.1111/J.1464-410X.2009.08887.X
Derya Yakar, Oscar A. Debats, Joyce G.R. Bomers, Martijn G. Schouten, Pieter C. Vos, Emile van Lin, Jurgen J. Fütterer, Jelle O. Barentsz, Predictive value of MRI in the localization, staging, volume estimation, assessment of aggressiveness, and guidance of radiotherapy and biopsies in prostate cancer. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging. ,vol. 35, pp. 20- 31 ,(2012) , 10.1002/JMRI.22790
Andrew J. Simpkin, Kate Tilling, Richard M. Martin, J. Athene Lane, Freddie C. Hamdy, Lars Holmberg, David E. Neal, Chris Metcalfe, Jenny L. Donovan, Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Factors Determining Change to Radical Treatment in Active Surveillance for Localized Prostate Cancer European Urology. ,vol. 67, pp. 993- 1005 ,(2015) , 10.1016/J.EURURO.2015.01.004
Edward M. Lawrence, Sarah Y. W. Tang, Tristan Barrett, Brendan Koo, Debra A. Goldman, Anne Y. Warren, Richard G. Axell, Andrew Doble, Ferdia A. Gallagher, Vincent J. Gnanapragasam, Christof Kastner, Evis Sala, Prostate cancer: performance characteristics of combined T 2 W and DW-MRI scoring in the setting of template transperineal re-biopsy using MR-TRUS fusion European Radiology. ,vol. 24, pp. 1497- 1505 ,(2014) , 10.1007/S00330-014-3159-0