Hollander’s Ricardo

作者: Alessandro Roncaglia

DOI: 10.1080/01603477.1982.11489297

关键词:

摘要: Samuel Hollander's impressive book The Economics of David Ricardo (1979a) is the culmination many papers (1971, 1973b, 1975, 1977a, 1977b, 1977c, 1979b, Hicks and Hollander, 1977). It also a sequel to his on Adam Smith (1973). intended be "the definitive work for decades" (according publisher's description) part far-reaching reconstruction history economic thought. stresses interdependence distributive pricing problems, market as an allocative mechanism. emerges fully integrated in tradition general equilibrium theorists, descending from neoclassical writers. This assessment challenges view Sraffa (and current neo-Ricardian or Cambridge tradition) edition Ricardo's Works Correspondence (1951 seq.) restores previous judgment Alfred Marshall (1961, appendix I). On this basis thought would appear continuous homogeneous line, centered mechanism revolving around supply-and-demand interdependence. views dispute, therefore, any clear-cut distinction (methodological, conceptual, analytical) between classical political economy marginalist economics. For if dividing lines are introduced, they should separate

参考文章(45)
Luigi L. Pasinetti, A New Theoretical Approach to the Problems of Economic Growth Ponteficiae Academiae Scientiarum Scripta Varia. pp. 571- 696 ,(1965)
Pierangelo Garegnani, Il capitale nelle teorie della distribuzione A. Giuffrè. ,(1960)
Samuel Hollander, Smith and Ricardo: Aspects of the Nineteenth-Century Legacy The American Economic Review. ,vol. 67, pp. 37- 41 ,(1977)
SAMUEL HOLLANDER, THE RECEPTION OF RICARDIAN ECONOMICS Oxford Economic Papers. ,vol. 29, pp. 221- 257 ,(1977) , 10.1093/OXFORDJOURNALS.OEP.A041368
John Stuart Mill, Collected Works of John Stuart Mill ,(1974)
JOHN HICKS, THE RICARDIAN SYSTEM: A COMMENT Oxford Economic Papers. ,vol. 31, pp. 133- 134 ,(1979) , 10.1093/OXFORDJOURNALS.OEP.A041431
William Stanley Jevons, The Theory of Political Economy ,(1888)
Paul A. Samuelson, David Ricardo, Adam Smith, John Stuart Mill, The Canonical Classical Model of Political Economy Journal of Economic Literature. ,vol. 16, pp. 1415- 1434 ,(2016)
Paul A Samuelson, None, Noise and Signal in Debates among Classical Economists: A Reply Journal of Economic Literature. ,vol. 18, pp. 575- 578 ,(1980)