On the sins of short-form development.

作者: Denis M. McCarthy , Kristen G. Anderson , Gregory T. Smith

DOI: 10.1037//1040-3590.12.1.102

关键词:

摘要: The empirical short-form literature has been characterized by overly optimistic views of the transfer validity from parent form to short and weak application psychometric principles in validating forms. Reviewers have thus opposed constructing forms altogether, implying researchers are succumbing an inappropriate temptation trying abbreviate measures. authors disagree. do not oppose development forms, but they assert that standards for should be quite high. identify 2 general 9 specific methodological sins characterizing construction offer suggestions sound They recommend a set 6 priori steps consider procedures can use develop valid abbreviated clinical-assessment procedures.

参考文章(25)
William J. Corulla, A revised version of the Psychoticism scale for children Personality and Individual Differences. ,vol. 11, pp. 65- 76 ,(1990) , 10.1016/0191-8869(90)90169-R
Philip Levy, Short-form tests. A methodological review. Psychological Bulletin. ,vol. 69, pp. 410- 416 ,(1968) , 10.1037/H0025736
Darcy A. Santor, James C. Coyne, Shortening the CES-D to improve its ability to detect cases of depression Psychological Assessment. ,vol. 9, pp. 233- 243 ,(1997) , 10.1037/1040-3590.9.3.233
Bernard E. Whitley Jr., A short form of the Expanded Attributional Style Questionnaire. Journal of Personality Assessment. ,vol. 56, pp. 365- 369 ,(1991) , 10.1207/S15327752JPA5602_14
Jacques Donders, A Short Form of the WISC-III for Clinical Use. Psychological Assessment. ,vol. 9, pp. 15- 20 ,(1997) , 10.1037/1040-3590.9.1.15
Gregory T. Smith, Denis M. McCarthy, Methodological considerations in the refinement of clinical assessment instruments. Psychological Assessment. ,vol. 7, pp. 300- 308 ,(1995) , 10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.300
Ronald K. Hambleton, Hariharan Swaminathan, H. Jane Rogers, Fundamentals of Item Response Theory ,(1991)
Kim T. Mueser, Alan S. Bellack, Julie H. Wade, Validation of a short version of the Camberwell Family Interview. Psychological Assessment. ,vol. 4, pp. 524- 529 ,(1992) , 10.1037/1040-3590.4.4.524