摘要: Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to clarify the legal status domain names from both a contractual and property right perspective, consider whether are be considered as new form property, in particular virtual property.Design/methodology/approach approaches topic perspective. It then examines concept various law theories. This followed by an analysis intangibility appropriate category protection.Findings Domain creatures contract will provide some protection. According bundle rights theory, intangible with limitations. Some very valuable but nevertheless attract no protection beyond rights. These should clothed relevant still contentious issue.Originality/value nature over key e...
sci-hub.se 参考文章(11)
Alison Clarke, Paul Kohler, Property Law: Commentary and Materials ,(2009)
David F. Fanning, Quasi In Rem on the Cyberseas Chicago-Kent} Law Review. ,vol. 76, pp. 1887- ,(2001)
Jeremy Bentham, C. K. Ogden, The theory of legislation. ,(1975)
Lionel Bently, Brad Sherman, The Making of Modern Intellectual Property Law ,(1999)
A. Mechele Dickerson, From Jeans to Genes: The Evolving Nature of Property of the Estate 15 Bankruptcy Developments Journal 285-319 (1999). ,(1999)
Kenton K. Yee, location.location.location: Internet Addresses as Evolving Property Social Science Research Network. ,(2001) , 10.2139/SSRN.270578
Thomas W. Merrill, Henry E. Smith, Property: Principles And Policies ,(2007)
P Eleftheriadis, The Analysis of Property Rights Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. ,vol. 16, pp. 31- 54 ,(1996) , 10.1093/OJLS/16.1.31
W. B. Chik, Lord of Your Domain, but Master of None: The Need to Harmonize and Recalibrate the Domain Name Regime of Ownership and Control International Journal of Law and Information Technology. ,vol. 16, pp. 8- 72 ,(2007) , 10.1093/IJLIT/EAM005
Michael Meehan, Virtual Property: Protecting Bits In Context Richmond Journal of Law and Technology. ,vol. 13, pp. 7- ,(2006)