A rapid method to increase transparency and efficiency in web-based searches

作者: Neal R. Haddaway , Alexandra M. Collins , Deborah Coughlin , Stuart Kirk

DOI: 10.1186/S13750-016-0079-2

关键词:

摘要: Many online search facilities allow searching for academic literature. The majority are bibliographic databases that catalogue published research in an iterative, semi-automated manner, e.g. Web of Science Core Collections, which indexes articles selected journals. Other resources, such as Google Scholar, identify by using engines crawl the internet potentially relevant information. Often, systematic reviewers wish to document their searches transparency or later screening. Indeed, is a cornerstone review methodology. Whilst typically users extract results citations bulk, several other key Scholar and organisation websites, do not this: must be extracted individually, often prohibitively time consuming. Here, we describe novel methods downloading from websites web-based into comprehensive free-to-use software. Citations can then integrated procedures along with those traditional databases. These substantially increase repeatability when resources. They may also significantly reduce resource requirements therefore represent significant efficiency.

参考文章(27)
Gautam Pant, Filippo Menczer, Topical Crawling for Business Intelligence international conference theory and practice digital libraries. pp. 233- 244 ,(2003) , 10.1007/978-3-540-45175-4_22
Pant Gautam, Srinivasan Padmini, Menczer Filippo, Levene Mark, Poulovassilis Alexandra, Crawling the Web Web Dynamics. pp. 153- 177 ,(2004) , 10.1007/978-3-662-10874-1_7
Julian P. T. Higgins, Sally Green, Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions ,(2019)
N.R. Haddaway, P. Woodcock, B. Macura, A. Collins, Making literature reviews more reliable through application of lessons from systematic reviews. Conservation Biology. ,vol. 29, pp. 1596- 1605 ,(2015) , 10.1111/COBI.12541
Dilys Roe, Max Fancourt, Chris Sandbrook, Mxolisi Sibanda, Alessandra Giuliani, Andrew Gordon-Maclean, Which components or attributes of biodiversity influence which dimensions of poverty Environmental Evidence. ,vol. 3, pp. 3- 18 ,(2014) , 10.1186/2047-2382-3-3
Joost C. F. de Winter, Amir A. Zadpoor, Dimitra Dodou, The expansion of Google Scholar versus Web of Science: a longitudinal study Scientometrics. ,vol. 98, pp. 1547- 1565 ,(2014) , 10.1007/S11192-013-1089-2
David Moher, Alexander Tsertsvadze, Andrea C. Tricco, Martin Eccles, Jeremy Grimshaw, Margaret Sampson, Nick Barrowman, A systematic review identified few methods and strategies describing when and how to update systematic reviews Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. ,vol. 60, pp. 1095- 1104 ,(2007) , 10.1016/J.JCLINEPI.2007.03.008
David Moher, Alessandro Liberati, Jennifer Tetzlaff, Douglas G Altman, None, Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement International Journal of Surgery. ,vol. 8, pp. 336- 341 ,(2010) , 10.1016/J.IJSU.2010.02.007
Gary A. Churchill, When Are Results Too Good to Be True Genetics. ,vol. 198, pp. 447- 448 ,(2014) , 10.1534/GENETICS.114.169912
Lyndal J Trevena, Brian J Zikmund-Fisher, Adrian Edwards, Wolfgang Gaissmaier, Mirta Galesic, Paul KJ Han, John King, Margaret L Lawson, Suzanne K Linder, Isaac Lipkus, Elissa Ozanne, Ellen Peters, Danielle Timmermans, Steven Woloshin, Presenting quantitative information about decision outcomes: a risk communication primer for patient decision aid developers BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making. ,vol. 13, pp. 1- 15 ,(2013) , 10.1186/1472-6947-13-S2-S7