RevManHAL: towards automatic text generation in systematic reviews

作者: Mercedes Torres Torres , Clive E. Adams

DOI: 10.1186/S13643-017-0421-Y

关键词:

摘要: Systematic reviews are a key part of healthcare evaluation. They involve important painstaking but repetitive work. A major producer systematic reviews, the Cochrane Collaboration, employs Review Manager (RevMan) programme—a software which assists reviewers and produces XML-structured files. This paper describes an add-on programme (RevManHAL) helps auto-generate abstract, results discussion sections RevMan-generated in multiple languages. The also future developments for RevManHAL. RevManHAL was created Java using NetBeans by programmer working full time 2 months. resulting open-source uses editable phrase banks to envelop text/numbers from within prepared RevMan file formatted readable text chosen language. In this way, considerable parts review’s ‘abstract’, ‘results’ ‘discussion’ added ‘acknowledgements’. RevManHAL’s output needs be checked reviewers, already, our experience Schizophrenia Group (200 maintained 900 reviewers), has saved much is better employed thinking about meaning data rather than restating them. Many more functions will become possible as review writing becomes increasingly automated.

参考文章(14)
Laura Slaughter, Christopher Friis Berntsen, Linn Brandt, Chris Mavergames, Enabling Living Systematic Reviews and Clinical Guidelines through Semantic Technologies D-Lib Magazine. ,vol. 21, pp. 8- ,(2015) , 10.1045/JANUARY2015-SLAUGHTER
R. Smith, The Cochrane collaboration at 20. BMJ. ,vol. 347, ,(2013) , 10.1136/BMJ.F7383
Verena G Herbert, Andreas Frings, Herwig Rehatschek, Gisbert Richard, Andreas Leithner, Wikipedia – challenges and new horizons in enhancing medical education BMC Medical Education. ,vol. 15, pp. 32- 32 ,(2015) , 10.1186/S12909-015-0309-2
Ioana Nicolau, Daphne Ling, Lulu Tian, Christian Lienhardt, Madhukar Pai, Research Questions and Priorities for Tuberculosis: A Survey of Published Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses PLoS ONE. ,vol. 7, pp. e42479- ,(2012) , 10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0042479
Guy Tsafnat, Paul Glasziou, Miew Keen Choong, Adam Dunn, Filippo Galgani, Enrico Coiera, None, Systematic review automation technologies. Systematic Reviews. ,vol. 3, pp. 74- 74 ,(2014) , 10.1186/2046-4053-3-74
Gordon Guyatt, Andrew D. Oxman, Elie A. Akl, Regina Kunz, Gunn Vist, Jan Brozek, Susan Norris, Yngve Falck-Ytter, Paul Glasziou, Hans deBeer, GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction-GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. ,vol. 64, pp. 383- 394 ,(2011) , 10.1016/J.JCLINEPI.2010.04.026
Elaine M Beller, Joyce Kee-Hsin Chen, Una Li-Hsiang Wang, Paul P Glasziou, Are systematic reviews up-to-date at the time of publication? Systematic Reviews. ,vol. 2, pp. 36- 36 ,(2013) , 10.1186/2046-4053-2-36
Haoyu Chen, Vishal Jhanji, Survey of systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in ophthalmology British Journal of Ophthalmology. ,vol. 96, pp. 896- 899 ,(2012) , 10.1136/BJOPHTHALMOL-2012-301589