Comparative study of five commercial reagents for preparing normal and leukaemic lymphocytes for immunophenotypic analysis by flow cytometry

作者: M.G. Macey , D.A. McCarthy , T. Milne , J.D. Cavenagh , A.C. Newland

DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0320(19990815)38:4<153::AID-CYTO2>3.0.CO;2-E

关键词:

摘要: The flow cytometric analysis of leucocytes in whole blood is usually performed on samples which the erythrocytes have been lysed and fixed. Because lysis fixation reagents potential to introduce artefacts, several commercially available were used prepare normal leukaemic lymphocytes for immunophenotypic by cytometry, results compared with those obtained from live blood. tested ImmunoPrep system OptiLyse C (Coulter), LF-1000-Lyse Flow (Harlan), Uti-Lyse (Dako) FACS Lysing Solution (Becton Dickinson). effect each reagent apparent expression CD3, CD5, CD11b, CD45, FMC7, kappa lambda antigens was determined six controls patients chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL). following observations made: (i) time minutes procedure varied markedly 1.5, 15, 20, 30 system, C, Uti-Lyse, Solution, LF-1000, respectively, but only 0.5 min (ii) forward side scatter characteristics affected all procedures, this most marked Flow. (iii) gave preparations poor resolution due presence residual red cell fragments. (iv) Lysis procedures did not affect or FMC7 CLL samples, highly variable kappa, samples. We conclude that can different artefacts are best avoided analysing

参考文章(16)
M.G. Macey, X.P. Jiang, P. Veys, D. McCarthy, A.C. Newland, Expression of functional antigens on neutrophils: Effects of preparation Journal of Immunological Methods. ,vol. 149, pp. 37- 42 ,(1992) , 10.1016/S0022-1759(12)80046-9
Xavier Bossuyt, Gerald E. Marti, Thomas A. Fleisher, Comparative analysis of whole blood lysis methods for flow cytometry. Cytometry. ,vol. 30, pp. 124- 133 ,(1997) , 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0320(19970615)30:3<124::AID-CYTO3>3.0.CO;2-L
M.G. Macey, D.A. McCarthy, S. Vordermeier, A.C. Newland, K.A. Brown, Effects of cell purification methods on CD11b and l-selectin expression as well as the adherence and activation of leucocytes Journal of Immunological Methods. ,vol. 181, pp. 211- 219 ,(1995) , 10.1016/0022-1759(95)00003-S
Kenneth A. Davis, Barnaby Abrams, Sujata B. Iyer, Robert A. Hoffman, James E. Bishop, Determination of CD4 antigen density on cells: Role of antibody valency, avidity, clones, and conjugation Cytometry. ,vol. 33, pp. 197- 205 ,(1998) , 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0320(19981001)33:2<197::AID-CYTO14>3.0.CO;2-P
M.G Macey, D.A McCarthy, A van Agthoven, A.C Newland, How should CD34+ cells be analysed? A study of three classes of antibody and five leucocyte preparation procedures Journal of Immunological Methods. ,vol. 204, pp. 175- 188 ,(1997) , 10.1016/S0022-1759(97)00045-8
D. A. McCarthy, Marion G. Macey, Mary R. Cahill, A. C. Newland, Effect of fixation on quantification of the expression of leucocyte function‐associated surface antigens Cytometry. ,vol. 17, pp. 39- 49 ,(1994) , 10.1002/CYTO.990170106
D.A. McCarthy, M.G. Macey, A simple flow cytometric procedure for the determination of surface antigens on unfixed leucocytes in whole blood Journal of Immunological Methods. ,vol. 163, pp. 155- 160 ,(1993) , 10.1016/0022-1759(93)90117-P
J. Lundahl, G. Halldén, M. Hallgren, C.M. Sköld, J. Hed, Altered expression of CD11b/CD18 and CD62L on human monocytes after cell preparation procedures Journal of Immunological Methods. ,vol. 180, pp. 93- 100 ,(1995) , 10.1016/0022-1759(94)00303-E