Anger and its consequences for judgment and behavior: Recent developments in social and political psychology

作者: Alan J. Lambert , Fade R. Eadeh , Emily J. Hanson

DOI: 10.1016/BS.AESP.2018.12.001

关键词:

摘要: Abstract In the eyes of public—and in a substantial amount scholarly research—anger is often framed negative light, given its role driving people to act antisocial ways. However, anger also has potential for social good, insofar as it focuses attention on, and motivates fix, perceived injustices. As we discuss, foundational link between desire rectify injustice profoundly important implications that are relevant research theory variety different disciplines (e.g., experimental psychology, neuroscience, political science, personality). We begin this chapter by considering methodological theoretical challenges involved measurement feeling state, along with relevance our line on revenge, well ideological consequences threat. course discussion, introduce neo-Gibsonian framework threat which allows fact types threats, via anger, can exert consequences. A key prediction model—one distinguishes from current models threat—is activation following shift attitudes “right” or “left,” depending nature at hand. These other findings provide more comprehensive understanding emotion, relation (perceived actual) injustice, shaping beliefs.

参考文章(174)
Donald G. Dutton, Anger in Intimate Relationships Springer, New York, NY. pp. 535- 544 ,(2010) , 10.1007/978-0-387-89676-2_30
Mitchell J. Callan, Robbie M. Sutton, Annelie J. Harvey, Rael J. Dawtry, Immanent Justice Reasoning. Theory, Research, and Current Directions. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. ,vol. 49, pp. 105- 161 ,(2014) , 10.1016/B978-0-12-800052-6.00002-0
Gerhard Stemmler, Somatovisceral Activation During Anger Springer, New York, NY. pp. 103- 121 ,(2010) , 10.1007/978-0-387-89676-2_7
Roger Giner-Sorolla, Affect in attitude: Immediate and deliberative perspectives. Guilford Press. ,(1999)
Carolyn L. Hafer, Alicia N. Rubel, The Why and How of Defending Belief in a Just World Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. ,vol. 51, pp. 41- 96 ,(2015) , 10.1016/BS.AESP.2014.09.001
Charlotte vanOyen Witvliet, Scott R. Hinze, Everett L. Worthington, Unresolved Injustice: Christian Religious Commitment, Forgiveness, Revenge, and Cardiovascular Responding Journal of Psychology and Christianity. ,vol. 27, pp. 110- ,(2008)
Dale T. Miller, Michael Ross, The Justice Motive in Everyday Life ,(2010)
Kees van den Bos, E. Allan Lind, Uncertainty management by means of fairness judgments Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. ,vol. 34, pp. 1- 60 ,(2002) , 10.1016/S0065-2601(02)80003-X