Estimating ankle joint impedance in the stance phase of gait using an instrumented treadmill

作者: H. Kristinsdottir

DOI:

关键词:

摘要: Quantifying increased resistance of the ankle joint to motion, referred as impedance, is important for determining appropriate treatment rehabilitation upper motor neuron (UMN) diseases. The impedance can be attributed viscoelasticity tissues surrounding clinically treated with splinting and exaggerated stretch reflexes botulinum toxin injections. choosing clinical improved if discrimination would possible between contribution tissue viscoelasticity. Ashworth Score a widely used test quantify effect UMN diseases on mechanics although it not able discriminate Moreover, performed under stationary conditions treatments are aimed at improving ability patients perform functional movement such walking. Therefore, there need improve method quantifying by discriminating two contributing factors Specifically, benefit in walking enable determined basis goal this study design evaluate identify stance phase gait. intrinsic impedance. An instrumented treadmill that measured forces moments, motion capture system positions linear model moment around was estimate underlying parameters i.e. damping stiffness well mass foot. To investigate reliability also applied 20 kg weight where estimated parameter. For experiment 21.7 average standard error mean (SEM) 8.3%. foot 3.7 SEM 68%, 2.8 Nms value 32.1% 425.1 Nm 28%. could accurately, while were low accuracy especially Overall, developed provides good future work further measurements.

参考文章(12)
Thomas G. McPoil, Harry G. Knecht, Biomechanics of the foot in walking: a function approach. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy. ,vol. 7, pp. 69- 72 ,(1985) , 10.2519/JOSPT.1985.7.2.69
D. Gordon, E. Robertson, David A. Winter, Mechanical energy generation, absorption and transfer amongst segments during walking Journal of Biomechanics. ,vol. 13, pp. 845- 854 ,(1980) , 10.1016/0021-9290(80)90172-4
I.W. Hunter, R.E. Kearney, Dynamics of human ankle stiffness: Variation with mean ankle torque Journal of Biomechanics. ,vol. 15, pp. 747- 752 ,(1982) , 10.1016/0021-9290(82)90089-6
E. J. Rouse, L. J. Hargrove, E. J. Perreault, T. A. Kuiken, Estimation of human ankle impedance during walking using the perturberator robot 2012 4th IEEE RAS & EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (BioRob). pp. 373- 378 ,(2012) , 10.1109/BIOROB.2012.6290842
A. Forner-Cordero, H.J.F.M. Koopman, F.C.T. van der Helm, Describing gait as a sequence of states. Journal of Biomechanics. ,vol. 39, pp. 948- 957 ,(2006) , 10.1016/J.JBIOMECH.2005.01.019
G. C. Agarwal, C. L. Gottlieb, Compliance of the Human Ankle Joint Journal of Biomechanical Engineering. ,vol. 99, pp. 166- 170 ,(1977) , 10.1115/1.3426285
B Koopman, E H F van Asseldonk, H van der Kooij, In vivo measurement of human knee and hip dynamics using MIMO system identification international conference of the ieee engineering in medicine and biology society. ,vol. 2010, pp. 3426- 3429 ,(2010) , 10.1109/IEMBS.2010.5627893
R.E. Kearney, R.B. Stein, L. Parameswaran, Identification of intrinsic and reflex contributions to human ankle stiffness dynamics IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering. ,vol. 44, pp. 493- 504 ,(1997) , 10.1109/10.581944
A D Pandyan, G R Johnson, C I M Price, R H Curless, M P Barnes, H Rodgers, A review of the properties and limitations of the Ashworth and modified Ashworth Scales as measures of spasticity Clinical Rehabilitation. ,vol. 13, pp. 373- 383 ,(1999) , 10.1191/026921599677595404
Diane L Damiano, Jeffrey M Quinlivan, Bryan F Owen, Patricia Payne, Karen C Nelson, Mark F Abel, What does the Ashworth scale really measure and are instrumented measures more valid and precise Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology. ,vol. 44, pp. 112- 118 ,(2002) , 10.1017/S0012162201001761