Sensitivity in the operation of conventional and alternatively fuelled public service vehicles on Merseyside

作者: S Finnegan , K Booth , R G Tickell

DOI: 10.2495/UT040571

关键词:

摘要: This paper compares the sensitivity in operation of conventional and alternatively fuelled Public Service Vehicles (PSVs) across Merseyside. Each fuel is compared on a life cycle assessment (LCA) basis, with addition landfill gas (LFG) as viable alternative. On complete LFG powered vehicles compare favourably gas-powered generally cause less pollution than liquid-fuel vehicles, electric producing least overall. In majority cases, analysis has revealed that most significant stage cycles each vehicle end-use (fuel combustion) stage. some cases this alone contributes to 90% total emissions. Daily annual changes have large influence amount released into atmosphere.

参考文章(6)
Leo Alting, Henrik Wenzel, Michael Hauschild, Environmental assessment of products ,(1997)
Forbes R. McDougall, Peter Hindle, Marina Franke, Peter R. White, Integrated Solid Waste Management: A Life Cycle Inventory ,(2001)
Linda Gaines, Margaret Singh, Energy and Environmental Impacts of Electric Vehicle Battery Production and Recycling SAE Technical Paper Series. ,(1995) , 10.4271/951865
Jeremy Hackney, Richard de Neufville, Life cycle model of alternative fuel vehicles: emissions, energy, and cost trade-offs Transportation Research Part A-policy and Practice. ,vol. 35, pp. 243- 266 ,(2001) , 10.1016/S0965-8564(99)00057-9
Anna Björklund, Integrated solid waste management: A life cycle inventory (2nd edition) International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. ,vol. 7, pp. 54- 54 ,(2002) , 10.1007/BF02978911
John Sheehan, Vince Camobreco, James Duffield, Michael Graboski, Michael Graboski, Housein Shapouri, Life Cycle Inventory of Biodiesel and Petroleum Diesel for Use in an Urban Bus ,(1998) , 10.2172/1218369