The Effects of Pre-admonition Suggestions on Eyewitnesses’ Choosing Rates and Retrospective Identification Judgments
作者： Deah S Quinlivan , Gary L Wells , Jeffrey S Neuschatz , Katherine M Luecht , Daniella K Cash
DOI: 10.1007/S11896-016-9216-7
关键词:
摘要: Pre-admonition suggestion is an identification-relevant comment made to eyewitness by a lineup administrator before the admonition. Quinlivan et al. (2012) found that their inflated mistaken identification rates and retrospective identification. However, used was compound statement, making it unclear which component influenced choosing rates. The current experiment conducted parse out effects. Participants (N = 211) viewed crime video received either one of (a pick or witness had paid substantial attention), both components, no suggestion. All participants admonition, choice, answered questions about witnessing experience. results demonstrated increased identifications from perpetrator-absent whereas effects attention were restricted judgments. These show support for role secondary (non-memorial) processes in
springer.com
sci-hub.se 参考文章(22)
Peter Neufeld, Barry Scheck, Jim Dwyer, Actual Innocence : Five Days to Execution and Other Dispatches from the Wrongly Convicted Doubleday. ,(2000)
Jennifer L. Beaudry, Melissa Boyce, R. C. L. Lindsay, Belief of Eyewitness Identification Evidence The handbook of eyewitness psychology, vol. II: Memory for people / R. C. L. Lindsay, David F. Ross, J. Don Read and Michael P. Toglia (eds). pp. 501- ,(2007) , 10.4324/9781315805535.CH19
Steve D. Charman, Gary L. Wells, The Moderating Effect of Ecphoric Experience on Post‐identification Feedback: A Critical Test of the Cues‐based Inference Conceptualization Applied Cognitive Psychology. ,vol. 26, pp. 243- 250 ,(2012) , 10.1002/ACP.1815
Deah S. Quinlivan, Jeffrey S. Neuschatz, Brian L. Cutler, Gary L. Wells, Joy McClung, Devin L. Harker, Do pre‐admonition suggestions moderate the effect of unbiased lineup instructions? Legal and Criminological Psychology. ,vol. 17, pp. 165- 176 ,(2012) , 10.1348/135532510X533554
Nancy Mehrkens Steblay, Social influence in eyewitness recall: A meta-analytic review of lineup instruction effects. Law and Human Behavior. ,vol. 21, pp. 283- 297 ,(1997) , 10.1023/A:1024890732059
Gary L. Wells, Deah S. Quinlivan, The eyewitness post-identification feedback effect: What is the function of flexible confidence estimates for autobiographical events? Applied Cognitive Psychology. ,vol. 23, pp. 1153- 1163 ,(2009) , 10.1002/ACP.1616
Gary L. Wells, Deah S. Quinlivan, Suggestive eyewitness identification procedures and the Supreme Court's reliability test in light of eyewitness science: 30 years later. Law and Human Behavior. ,vol. 33, pp. 1- 24 ,(2009) , 10.1007/S10979-008-9130-3
Brian L. Cutler, Steven D. Penrod, Hedy Red Dexter, Juror Sensitivity to Eyewitness Identification Evidence Law and Human Behavior. ,vol. 14, pp. 185- 191 ,(1990) , 10.1007/BF01062972
Endel Tulving, Similarity relations in recognition Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior. ,vol. 20, pp. 479- 496 ,(1981) , 10.1016/S0022-5371(81)90129-8
Michael R. Leippe, Donna Eisenstadt, Shannon M. Rauch, Mark A. Stambush, Effects of Social-Comparative Memory Feedback on Eyewitnesses' Identification Confidence, Suggestibility, and Retrospective Memory Reports Basic and Applied Social Psychology. ,vol. 28, pp. 201- 220 ,(2006) , 10.1207/S15324834BASP2803_1