摘要: Abstract Policy-makers in the most successful developing countries have not accepted either of two major schools thought on food price policy. The neo-classical school favours free trade to maximize efficiency resource allocation. structuralist interventions satisfy goals for income distribution. Especially rapidly growing, rice-based economies Asia, policy-makers been more concerned about stability domestic prices than their level relative world prices. This concern, traditionally dismissed by economists as purely political, is justified economic grounds because improved macroeconomic and dynamic from stable paper identifies both benefits costs achieving it.