Monetary Policy Indeterminacy in the U.S.: Results from a Classical Test

作者: Luca Fanelli , Efrem Castelnuovo

DOI: 10.6092/UNIBO/AMSACTA/3108

关键词:

摘要: We work with a newly developed method to empirically assess whether specified new-Keynesian business cycle monetary model estimated U.S. quarterly data is consistent unique equilibrium or multiple equilibria under rational expectations. conduct classical tests verify if the structural correctly specified. Conditional on positive answer, we formally such either indeterminacy. Importantly, our full-system approach requires neither use of prior distributions nor that nonstandard inference. The case an indeterminate in pre-1984 sample and determinate post-1984 favored by data. long-run coefficients inflation output gap policy rule are found be weakly identified. However, results further supported proposed identification-robust indicator

参考文章(45)
Luca Sala, Fabio Canova, Back to square one: identification issues in DSGE models Research Papers in Economics. ,(2006)
Thomas Sargent, L.P. Hansen, Linear Rational Expectations Models of Dynamically Interrelated Variables Research Papers in Economics. ,(1981)
Alastair R. Hall, Generalized Method of Moments ,(2005)
Bennett McCallum, On non-uniqueness in rational expectations models: An attempt at perspective Journal of Monetary Economics. ,vol. 11, pp. 139- 168 ,(1983) , 10.3386/W0684
Edward Herbst, Frank Schorfheide, Evaluating DSGE model forecasts of comovements Journal of Econometrics. ,vol. 171, pp. 152- 166 ,(2012) , 10.1016/J.JECONOM.2012.06.008
Marco Lippi, Lucrezia Reichlin, VAR analysis, nonfundamental representations, Blaschke matrices Journal of Econometrics. ,vol. 63, pp. 307- 325 ,(1994) , 10.1016/0304-4076(93)01570-C
Lars Peter Hansen, Thomas J. Sargent, Formulating and estimating dynamic linear rational expectations models Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control. ,vol. 2, pp. 7- 46 ,(1980) , 10.1016/0165-1889(80)90049-4
Andreas Beyer, Roger E. A Farmer, Testing for Indeterminacy: An Application to U.S. Monetary Policy: Reply The American Economic Review. ,vol. 97, pp. 524- 529 ,(2007) , 10.1257/AER.97.1.524