The Readability of Company Responses to SEC Comment Letters and SEC 10-K Filing Review Outcomes

作者: Cory A. Cassell , Lauren M. Cunningham , Ling Lei Lisic

DOI: 10.2139/SSRN.2595661

关键词:

摘要: An emerging literature shows that shareholders benefit from the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) filing review process in terms of improved disclosures reduced information asymmetry. However, SEC reviews also impose significant costs on companies because comment letter remediation diverts substantial time resources away normal operations may result restated or amended filings. Applying processing fluency theory, we examine whether readability company’s initial response to an affects likelihood unfavorable outcomes process. Specifically, using Fog index, Flesch Reading Ease Index, Kincaid Index measure response, predict find less readable company responses are associated with longer times a higher files restatement amendment as review. Our results should be interest managers, boards directors, audit committees, other stakeholders involved formulating comments they suggest improving is relative easy inexpensive way for mitigate

参考文章(50)
Samuel B. Bonsall, Andrew J. Leone, Brian P. Miller, A Plain English Measure of Financial Reporting Readability Social Science Research Network. ,(2016) , 10.2139/SSRN.2560644
Yen-Jung Lee, The Effect of Quarterly Report Readability on Information Efficiency of Stock Prices Contemporary Accounting Research. ,vol. 29, pp. 1137- 1170 ,(2012) , 10.1111/J.1911-3846.2011.01152.X
Feng Li, Textual Analysis of Corporate Disclosures: A Survey of the Literature Social Science Research Network. ,(2011)
Robert J. Bloomfield, The 'Incomplete Revelation Hypothesis' and Financial Reporting Social Science Research Network. ,(2002) , 10.2139/SSRN.312671
Rick M. Johnston, Reining Petacchi, Regulatory Oversight of Financial Reporting: Securities and Exchange Commission Comment Letters Social Science Research Network. ,(2015) , 10.2139/SSRN.1291345
Indrarini Laksmana, Wendy Tietz, Ya-Wen Yang, Compensation discussion and analysis (CD&A): Readability and management obfuscation Journal of Accounting and Public Policy. ,vol. 31, pp. 185- 203 ,(2012) , 10.1016/J.JACCPUBPOL.2011.08.003
Jennifer Francis, Donna Philbrick, Katherine Schipper, Shareholder Litigation and Corporate Disclosures Journal of Accounting Research. ,vol. 32, pp. 137- 164 ,(1994) , 10.2307/2491279
Miles B. Gietzmann, Angela K. Pettinicchio, External Auditor Reassessment of Client Business Risk Following the Issuance of a Comment Letter by the SEC European Accounting Review. ,vol. 23, pp. 57- 85 ,(2014) , 10.1080/09638180.2013.774703
Daniel M. Oppenheimer, Consequences of erudite vernacular utilized irrespective of necessity: problems with using long words needlessly Applied Cognitive Psychology. ,vol. 20, pp. 139- 156 ,(2006) , 10.1002/ACP.1178