摘要: Legal pluralism - as practice and theory is frequently viewed a functional response to the diversity of legal culture practices around globe. Such bottom up perspective elides questions ‘who’ promotes these experiments for ‘what’ reason. In essence, we argue that regulatory project should be understood technology jurisprudence provides templates institutional entrepreneurs such transnational agencies they develop novel institutions governance. Regulatory projects grounded in are attempts steer ‘rule law’ programs via incorporation private or civic actors within hybrids use social norms purse programs. Using customary regimes often reinvented has resonance with governance late colonial state through various forms indirect rule.