A new method for quantitative analysis of mammographic density.

作者: Carri K. Glide-Hurst , Neb Duric , Peter Littrup

DOI: 10.1118/1.2789407

关键词:

摘要: Women with mammographic percent density >50% have a approximately three-fold increased risk of developing breast cancer, potentially making them screening candidates for MRI scanning. The purpose this work is to introduce new method quantify (MPD), and compare the results current standard care assessment. Craniocaudal (CC) mediolateral oblique (MLO) mammograms 104 patients were digitized analyzed using an interactive computer-assisted segmentation routine implemented two purposes: (1) segment area from background radiographic markers, (2) dense fatty portions breast. Our technique was evaluated by comparing qualitative estimates determined certified radiologist BI-RADS Categorical Assessment (1 (fatty) 4 (dense) scale). Statistically significant correlations (two-tailed, p < 0.01) observed between calculated MPD both CC (Spearman rho = 0.67) MLO views 0.71). For view, statistically differences revealed mean each category except (BI-RADS 1) scattered 2). Finally, views, in all categories observed. Comparing strong positive correlation (Pearson r 0.8) MPD. In addition, evaluation reproducibility our demonstrated average deviation subsample eight patients, measured five times, 1.9% (range: 0.03%-9.9%). Eliminating one misassignment reduced 0.75% 0.03%-3.16%). Further analysis 10% patient sample agreement (ICC 0.80-0.85) reliability views. Overall, these demonstrate feasibility utilizing approach quantitative segmentation, which may be useful detecting small changes introduced through chemoprevention, diet, or other interventions.

参考文章(24)
Martin J. Yaffe, David L. Tritchler, Norman F. Boyd, Gina A. Lockwood, Jeff W. Byng, Mammographic densities and breast cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention. ,vol. 7, pp. 1133- 1144 ,(1998)
Wendie A. Berg, Cristina Campassi, Patricia Langenberg, Mary J. Sexton, Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System: inter- and intraobserver variability in feature analysis and final assessment. American Journal of Roentgenology. ,vol. 174, pp. 1769- 1777 ,(2000) , 10.2214/AJR.174.6.1741769
Gabriela Torres-Mejía, Bianca De Stavola, Diane S Allen, Juan J Pérez-Gavilán, Jorge M Ferreira, Ian S Fentiman, Isabel dos Santos Silva, Mammographic Features and Subsequent Risk of Breast Cancer: A Comparison of Qualitative and Quantitative Evaluations in the Guernsey Prospective Studies Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention. ,vol. 14, pp. 1052- 1059 ,(2005) , 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-04-0717
Melanie R Palomares, Joelle RB Machia, Constance D Lehman, Janet R Daling, Anne McTiernan, Mammographic Density Correlation with Gail Model Breast Cancer Risk Estimates and Component Risk Factors Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention. ,vol. 15, pp. 1324- 1330 ,(2006) , 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-05-0689
M J Yaffe, N F Boyd, J W Byng, R A Jong, E Fishell, G A Lockwood, L E Little, D L Tritchler, BREAST CANCER RISK AND MEASURED MAMMOGRAPHIC DENSITY European Journal of Cancer Prevention. ,vol. 7, ,(1998) , 10.1097/00008469-199802001-00010
N Jamal, KH Ng, LM Looi, D McLean, A Zulfiqar, S-Petal Tan, WF Liew, A Shantini, S Ranganathan, None, Quantitative assessment of breast density from digitized mammograms into Tabar's patterns Physics in Medicine and Biology. ,vol. 51, pp. 5843- 5857 ,(2006) , 10.1088/0031-9155/51/22/008
Valerie A McCormack, Isabel dos Santos Silva, Breast Density and Parenchymal Patterns as Markers of Breast Cancer Risk: A Meta-analysis Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention. ,vol. 15, pp. 1159- 1169 ,(2006) , 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-06-0034
Katherine E. Martin, Mark A. Helvie, Chuan Zhou, Marilyn A. Roubidoux, Janet E. Bailey, Chintana Paramagul, Caroline E. Blane, Katherine A. Klein, Seema S. Sonnad, Heang-Ping Chan, Mammographic Density Measured with Quantitative Computer-aided Method: Comparison with Radiologists' Estimates and BI-RADS Categories Radiology. ,vol. 240, pp. 656- 665 ,(2006) , 10.1148/RADIOL.2402041947
J W Byng, N F Boyd, L Little, G Lockwood, E Fishell, R A Jong, M J Yaffe, Symmetry of projection in the quantitative analysis of mammographic images European Journal of Cancer Prevention. ,vol. 5, pp. 319- 327 ,(1996) , 10.1097/00008469-199610000-00003
Luz A. Venta, R. Edward Hendrick, Yolanda T. Adler, Patricia DeLeon, Patricia M. Mengoni, Anna Marie Scharl, Christopher E. Comstock, Lori Hansen, Nicole Kay, Andrew Coveler, Gary Cutter, Rates and causes of disagreement in interpretation of full-field digital mammography and film-screen mammography in a diagnostic setting American Journal of Roentgenology. ,vol. 176, pp. 1241- 1248 ,(2001) , 10.2214/AJR.176.5.1761241