Canadian greenhouse gas mitigation options in agriculture

作者: R.L. Desjardins , S.N. Kulshreshtha , B. Junkins , W. Smith , B. Grant

DOI: 10.1023/A:1012697912871

关键词:

摘要: In 1991, on farm management practices contributed 57.6 Tg CO2 equivalent in greenhouse gas emissions, that is, about 10% of the anthropogenic GHG emissions Canada. Approximately 11% these were form CO2, 36% CH4 and 53% N2O. The from soils; enteric fermentation manure, N2O primarily a function cropping manure management. With all other agricultural included, such as fossil fuels used for transportation, manufacturing, food processing etc., sector's contributions 15% Canada's emissions. this publication, several options are examined to their potential reducing These involve soil crop management, nutrient improved feeding strategies, carbon storage industrial by-products. Canadian Economic Emissions Model Agriculture (CEEMA) was predict year 2010, well impact mitigation sector. This model incorporates Regional Agricultural sub-Model (CRAM), which predicts activities related agriculture Canada up Greenhouse Gas (GGEM), estimates associated with various activities. sources 90.5 1991. Estimates based CEEMA 2010 indicate expected be 98.0 under business usual scenario, assumes present trends will continue. sector then need reduce its by 12.9 below forecasted if it is attain part government commitment made Kyoto. Technologies focusing increasing sink, improving overall farming efficiency, refined developed best practices. soils sink can increased through reduced tillage, summer fallowing, use grasslands forage crops, etc. Key areas possible reduction handling, better livestock grazing dependent adoption rate. Agriculture's could probably met recognized Kyoto Accord wide range adopted large scale. None currently recommended measures because socio-economic aspects have not been fully evaluated there still too many uncertainties emission estimates.

参考文章(11)
J. Dumanski, R.L. Desjardins, C. Tarnocai, C. Monreal, E.G. Gregorich, V. Kirkwood, C.A. Campbell, Possibilities for future carbon sequestration in Canadian agriculture in relation to land use changes Climatic Change. ,vol. 40, pp. 81- 103 ,(1998) , 10.1023/A:1005390815340
D. I. Massé, R. L. Droste, Microbial interaction during the anaerobic treatment of swine manure slurry in a sequencing batch reactor. Canadian Agricultural Engineering. ,vol. 39, pp. 35- 41 ,(1997)
Keith Paustian, Henry Janzen, Rattan Lal, Michele Frome, James P. Bruce, Eric Haites, Carbon sequestration in soils Journal of Soil and Water Conservation. ,vol. 54, pp. 382- 389 ,(1999)
C. Vernon Cole, Klaus Flach, Jeffrey Lee, Dieter Sauerbeck, Bobby Stewart, Agricultural sources and sinks of carbon Water Air and Soil Pollution. ,vol. 70, pp. 111- 122 ,(1993) , 10.1007/978-94-011-1982-5_7
A. R. Mosier, W. J. Parton, D. W. Valentine, D. S. Ojima, D. S. Schimel, O. Heinemeyer, CH4and N2O fluxes in the Colorado shortgrass steppe: 2. Long-term impact of land use change Global Biogeochemical Cycles. ,vol. 11, pp. 29- 42 ,(1997) , 10.1029/96GB03612
W N Smith, R L Desjardins, B. Grant, Estimated changes in soil carbon associated with agricultural practices in Canada Canadian Journal of Soil Science. ,vol. 81, pp. 221- 227 ,(2001) , 10.4141/S00-033
W. N. Smith, R. L. Desjardins, E. Pattey, The net flux of carbon from agricultural soils in Canada 1970–2010 Global Change Biology. ,vol. 6, pp. 557- 568 ,(2000) , 10.1046/J.1365-2486.2000.00340.X
W. N. Smith, P. Rochette, C. Monreal, R. L. Desjardins, E. Pattey, A. Jaques, The rate of carbon change in agricultural soils in Canada at the landscape level Canadian Journal of Soil Science. ,vol. 77, pp. 219- 229 ,(1997) , 10.4141/S96-113
W. J. Parton, D. S. Schimel, C. V. Cole, D. S. Ojima, Analysis of factors controlling soil organic matter levels in Great Plains grasslands Soil Science Society of America Journal. ,vol. 51, pp. 1173- 1179 ,(1987) , 10.2136/SSSAJ1987.03615995005100050015X