Extended Length of Stay After Robotic-Assisted Hysterectomy: Association with Uterine Weight and Other Risk Factors

作者: Tarek Toubia , Lauren Schiff , Ganesa Wegienka , Roopina Sangha

DOI: 10.1089/GYN.2015.0063

关键词:

摘要: Abstract Background: Robotic-assisted hysterectomy (RH) has the same clinical benefits as laparoscopy and offers surgeons additional benefits. However, RH-related costs are high its have not been shown to be better than those achieved with laparoscopy. A key cost factor is length of (hospital) stay (LOS). Objective: The aim this study was identify relationship between uterine weight LOS following RH potential risk factors for extended LOS. Materials Methods: This involved a retrospective cohort all RHs performed in midwestern tertiary-care teaching hospital suburban affiliates, from January 2011 December 2012. Data were collected using Current Procedural Terminology codes. current authors examined if any several variables associated weight, Spearman's correlation continuous Wilcoxon's rank sum or Kruskal-Wallis test categorical variables. Comparison patients who d...

参考文章(13)
NINNIE BORENDAL WODLIN, LENA NILSSON, The development of fast‐track principles in gynecological surgery Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica. ,vol. 92, pp. 17- 27 ,(2013) , 10.1111/J.1600-0412.2012.01525.X
Thomas N. Payne, Francis R. Dauterive, Michael C. Pitter, Hoang N. Giep, Bang N. Giep, Terry W. Grogg, K. Anthony Shanbour, Darren W. Goff, Helen B. Hubert, Robotically Assisted Hysterectomy in Patients With Large Uteri Obstetrics & Gynecology. ,vol. 115, pp. 535- 542 ,(2010) , 10.1097/AOG.0B013E3181CF45AD
Katherine A. O’Hanlan, Stacey Paris McCutcheon, John G. McCutcheon, Laparoscopic hysterectomy: impact of uterine size. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology. ,vol. 18, pp. 85- 91 ,(2011) , 10.1016/J.JMIG.2010.09.016
Peter van Dam, Jan Hauspy, Luc Verkinderen, Xuan Bich Trinh, Pieter-Jan van Dam, Luc Van Looy, Luc Dirix, Are Costs of Robot-Assisted Surgery Warranted for Gynecological Procedures? Obstetrics and Gynecology International. ,vol. 2011, pp. 973830- 973830 ,(2011) , 10.1155/2011/973830
Dimitri Sarlos, LaVonne A. Kots, Robotic versus laparoscopic hysterectomy: a review of recent comparative studies. Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology. ,vol. 23, pp. 283- 288 ,(2011) , 10.1097/GCO.0B013E328348A26E
Danny C.Y. Chou, David M.B. Rosen, Gregory M. Cario, Mark A. Carlton, Alan M. Lam, Michael Chapman, Chris Johns, Home within 24 hours of laparoscopic hysterectomy. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. ,vol. 39, pp. 234- 238 ,(1999) , 10.1111/J.1479-828X.1999.TB03380.X
William Kondo, Nicolas Bourdel, Francesca Marengo, Anne-Sophie Azuar, Xavier Tran-ba-Vang, Horace Roman, Kris Jardon, Jean Luc Pouly, Benoit Rabischong, Revaz Botchorishvili, Gerard Mage, Michel Canis, Surgical Outcomes of Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for Enlarged Uteri Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology. ,vol. 18, pp. 310- 313 ,(2011) , 10.1016/J.JMIG.2011.01.006
Anne Lethaby, Beverley Vollenhoven, Martin Sowter, Efficacy of pre‐operative gonadotrophin hormone releasing analogues for women with uterine fibroids undergoing hysterectomy or myomectomy: a systematic review British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. ,vol. 109, pp. 1097- 1108 ,(2002) , 10.1111/J.1471-0528.2002.01225.X
John A. Thiel, Huse Kamencic, Assessment of Costs Associated With OutpatientTotal Laparoscopic Hysterectomy Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada. ,vol. 28, pp. 794- 798 ,(2006) , 10.1016/S1701-2163(16)32258-7
Claire L. Donohoe, Mai Nguyen, Jessica Cook, Sarah Geagan Murray, Nicole Chen, Fardziana Zaki, Brian J. Mehigan, Paul H. McCormick, John V. Reynolds, Fast-track protocols in colorectal surgery Surgeon-journal of The Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland. ,vol. 9, pp. 95- 103 ,(2011) , 10.1016/J.SURGE.2010.07.013