Whose Discourse Is It Anyway? Understanding Resistance through the Rise of "Barstool Biology" in Nature Conservation

作者: Erica von Essen

DOI: 10.1080/17524032.2015.1042986

关键词:

摘要: This study examines what happens when contentious lay citizens harness the technical-ecological repertoire of experts as means challenging nature conservation policy. The causes, manifestations, and implications this phenomenon are elucidated through a critical discourse analysis. case is based on wolf reintroduction project in Europe, with particular focus Sweden, using illegal hunting discussions point entry within community. It reveals deployment three topoi, which defined stock arguments situated discourse. Analysis shows how while some topoi often incur short-term gains debate because their scientific guise, they fundamentally relegated folk science (or “barstool biology”) by government and, cases, contribute to further marginalization other knowledges. Acquiescence shown greatly impede debate. Finally, lack trust public dialog, hunt...

参考文章(59)
Daniel C. Brouwer, Communication as counterpublic SAGE Publications Inc.. pp. 195- 208 ,(2006) , 10.4135/9781483329055.N22
Anders Horsbøl, Responding to Expert Arguments: Emerging Lay Topoi in Focus Group Interviews on GM Crops Responding to Expert Arguments. Emerging Lay Topoi in Focus Group Interviews on GM-Crops. pp. 395- 406 ,(2011)
Birger Steen Nielsen, Kurt Aagaard Nielsen, Methodologies in Action Research: Action Research and Critical Theory Shaker Publishing. pp. 63- 87 ,(2006)
Paul K. Feyerabend, Farewell to Reason ,(1987)
Peter Mühlhäusler, Rom Harré, Jens Brockmeier, Greenspeak: A Study of Environmental Discourse ,(1998)
Lilie Chouliaraki, Norman Fairclough, Discourse in late modernity : rethinking critical discourse analysis Edinburgh University Press. ,(1999)