Physics envy: trying to fit a square peg into a round hole.

作者: James Shanteau , David J. Weiss

DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X12003160

关键词:

摘要: Pothos & Busemeyer (P&B) argue that classical probability (CP) fails to describe human decision processes accurately and should be supplanted by quantum probability. We accept the premise, but reject P&B's conclusion. CP is a prescriptive framework has inspired great deal of valuable research. Also, because used across sciences, it cornerstone interdisciplinary collaboration.

参考文章(6)
Jonathan Baron, Normative Models of Judgment and Decision Making John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. pp. 19- 36 ,(2008) , 10.1002/9780470752937.CH2
Philip Mirowski, Do economists suffer from physics envy Finnish Economic Papers. ,vol. 5, pp. 61- 68 ,(1992)
Blackwell Handbook of Judgment and Decision Making Blackwell Publishing: Oxford. (2004). ,(2004) , 10.1002/9780470752937
Robert C. MacCallum, Shaobo Zhang, Kristopher J. Preacher, Derek D. Rucker, On the Practice of Dichotomization of Quantitative Variables Psychological Methods. ,vol. 7, pp. 19- 40 ,(2002) , 10.1037/1082-989X.7.1.19
Shira Elqayam, Jonathan St. B. T. Evans, Subtracting "ought" from "is": descriptivism versus normativism in the study of human thinking. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. ,vol. 34, pp. 233- 248 ,(2011) , 10.1017/S0140525X1100001X